PunBB

Full Version: NHL
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490
I just finished watching the Brian Leetch night a few minutes ago (i had to record it because i was at an Ozzy Ozbourne concert last night - amazing!).

Another terrific ceremony put on by the Rangers organization, they are second-to-none when it comes to such events IMO. The highlights from it for me including Darren Langdon & Tie Domi riding out on the 4-wheeler, towing the new Harley for Leetch, Brian making the announcement that the Rangers are going to retire Adam Graves' #9 next season (the look on Graves face was absolutely priceless, he was shocked/stunned), and then just seeing guys like Jeff Beukeboom on the Garden ice again...and obviously the raising of his #2. What a night!
skippy the wonder dog Wrote:
tigerthelion Wrote:... the Canucks seriously need a forward on their roster who is capable of putting the puck in the net like a true top 6 NHL forward SHOULD.

The Habs are kind of interesting here ... there's still plenty of time left for the wheels to fall off, but at the break they're trailing only the Red Wings, Sens, Stars and Ducks on points, despite the fact that they haven't had a credible offensive star since Guy Lafleur.

To me the interesting thing is that they haven't done that using the usual defensive formula (Devils). Only four teams have outscored them, despite the fact that their top scorer, Kovalev, is nowhere near the scoring leaders.

So I asks ya, is having a star forward overrated?

I don't think it's overrated. The last time the Canadiens won the Cup, they had Damphousse, who had 39 goals and 97 points that season, Brian Bellows with 40 goals and 88 points, Kirk Muller with 36 goals, Stephan Lebeau with 31 goals and 80 points. I'd say Damphousse was considered a star forward at that time, and Bellows probably was as well. Muller was considered a top tier leader.

I see what you're saying about this year's team. They are doing well without really having a star player. However, I don't think they have a team good enough to win the Cup. With a Sundin added to Montreal, I might have to rethink that.
If the Habs acquired Sundin, I think I'd have to retire from watching hockey, even if it got them the cup. That would be blasphemous. The only other worse thing would be seeing him traded to the Sens.
tigerthelion Wrote:
skippy the wonder dog Wrote:
tigerthelion Wrote:... the Canucks seriously need a forward on their roster who is capable of putting the puck in the net like a true top 6 NHL forward SHOULD.

The Habs are kind of interesting here ... there's still plenty of time left for the wheels to fall off, but at the break they're trailing only the Red Wings, Sens, Stars and Ducks on points, despite the fact that they haven't had a credible offensive star since Guy Lafleur.

To me the interesting thing is that they haven't done that using the usual defensive formula (Devils). Only four teams have outscored them, despite the fact that their top scorer, Kovalev, is nowhere near the scoring leaders.

So I asks ya, is having a star forward overrated?

I don't think it's overrated. The last time the Canadiens won the Cup, they had Damphousse....

Damphousse was never in the Lafleur class. But rather than argue over that, look back to '86. There was no offensive star on that team. Mats Naslund was the best they had.

Alternatively, look at Tampa Bay. Lecavalier is the genuine article, but that ain't doing much for the team.

Now, I won't lie to ya. I'd rather have depth and a marquee player, anyday....
skippy the wonder dog Wrote:
tigerthelion Wrote:
skippy the wonder dog Wrote:
tigerthelion Wrote:... the Canucks seriously need a forward on their roster who is capable of putting the puck in the net like a true top 6 NHL forward SHOULD.

The Habs are kind of interesting here ... there's still plenty of time left for the wheels to fall off, but at the break they're trailing only the Red Wings, Sens, Stars and Ducks on points, despite the fact that they haven't had a credible offensive star since Guy Lafleur.

To me the interesting thing is that they haven't done that using the usual defensive formula (Devils). Only four teams have outscored them, despite the fact that their top scorer, Kovalev, is nowhere near the scoring leaders.

So I asks ya, is having a star forward overrated?

I don't think it's overrated. The last time the Canadiens won the Cup, they had Damphousse....

Damphousse was never in the Lafleur class. But rather than argue over that, look back to '86. There was no offensive star on that team. Mats Naslund was the best they had.

Alternatively, look at Tampa Bay. Lecavalier is the genuine article, but that ain't doing much for the team.

Now, I won't lie to ya. I'd rather have depth and a marquee player, anyday....

Lecavalier's team won the Stanley Cup just a couple of seasons ago. :thumb:
cochise Wrote:
ikky99 Wrote:
tigerthelion Wrote:Still, the Canucks seriously need a forward on their roster who is capable of putting the puck in the net like a true top 6 NHL forward SHOULD.

Sundin to the Canucks!!!!! :jump

Well that is a rumour out there floating around right now. Sundin for Kesler and a top prospect (Schneider or Bourdon), plus potentially a couple draft picks.................

This was from a Vancouver paper as well................take it with a grain of salt, but very intriguing if you ask me..........

If I was Fletcher, thats a pretty nice offer, particularly if Sundin ended up being just a rental player. But I hear that is part of the deal as well, Sundin must be willing to sign for at least another year with the Canucks

GOTTA LOVE THE RUMOURS!!

I'd be happy with that. Kesler is a decent player but he's overrated. Luongo in net pretty much takes Schneider out of the future plans and Bourdon isn't a sure fire, can't miss prospect by any means. The Canucks can't draft anyway, so it would be worth the risk of draft picks. If nothing else, Sundin would at least allow me to watch a Canucks game with the idea that I MIGHT ACTUALLY BE ENTERTAINED. I know I am not the biggest fan of Mats but he's a better forward than anyone on Vancouver right now. He'd instantly become the best player other than Luongo on the roster.
colinjardine Wrote:If the Habs acquired Sundin, I think I'd have to retire from watching hockey, even if it got them the cup. That would be blasphemous. The only other worse thing would be seeing him traded to the Sens.

Toronto and Montreal would never pull off such a blockbuster trade...Leaf fans (who the hell would choose to be a Leaf fan?) would tear the ACC down brick by brick.
The Habs don't even like playing the Leafs in the preseason... I think Gainey has enough knowledge to not trade with them. Plus, Sundin would bolt at the end of the season, leaving Montreal down a few draft picks, and prospects.
This is one of the strangest things Ive ever seen in hockey..

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2008/01/24/peddie_fletcher_lipsynching/">http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2008/01/ ... psynching/</a><!-- m -->


Whats up with that? Confusedcratch:

Thats just too funny... :lol: :lol:
Yeah Geno Reda was showing/talking about that on TSN the night of the press conference. Looked strange indeed.
LizardKing51 Wrote:This is one of the strangest things Ive ever seen in hockey..

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2008/01/24/peddie_fletcher_lipsynching/">http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2008/01/ ... psynching/</a><!-- m -->


Whats up with that? Confusedcratch:

Thats just too funny... :lol: :lol:

What's up with that? Looks pretty clear to me. Fletcher is just another puppet for Peddy and MLSE.
LizardKing51 Wrote:This is one of the strangest things Ive ever seen in hockey..

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2008/01/24/peddie_fletcher_lipsynching/">http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2008/01/ ... psynching/</a><!-- m -->


Whats up with that? Confusedcratch:

Thats just too funny... :lol: :lol:

That's just ridiculous. While it is completely understandable that Peddie and Fletcher may have gone over the subtext of the declaration together, what followed (with the lip-synch support, and erroneous stare) provided a number of media-enticing, and potentially disturbing contextual scenarios, which some have eluded to previously.

I hope for the sake of the "Leafs Nation", that Fletcheddi picks a GM well suited for the development of a team from the bottom up. It's a painful process, but what does Fletcheddi and MLSE have to lose monetarily? Nothing. This isn't venture financing, this is blue-chip re-capitalization. Just get it over with so I don't have to hear about 'speculation', 'late third-period break-downs', or 'trade rumours' on SportsCentre anymore. Watching a veteran team in despair has become annoying; Watching a youthful team with vigilance, and drive, while losing or winning, at least provides promise and entertainment.

As well, I'd like to start a bi-weekly "Alfie for MVP" bi-dialogue, and I expect Cferneyh to second the movement. While I know the 'Sens Army' isn't well represented on this site, and small market teams like Ottawa generally get the shaft, I'm prepared for the lack of response, commentary, or rebuttal, but hope that Alfie continues to play with the determination he has had all season. I see plenty of Iginila (a mid-season MVP candidate), but when was the last time that a Senator's HNIC broadcast left the confines of the Nation's' Capital (excluding, of course, the Ottawa-Detroit game, where Alfredsson had a couple)? I imagine the team is a bit of mystery to most of Western Canada, and the GTA.

As Pierre McGuire (can't stand the guy) said on the Ottawa Sports Radio 1200 yesterday, Ottawa fans have to start cheering "MVP" instead of "Alfie" for the guy to even have a chance on the ballot. I think baldy is right.
Alfredsson just might be my MVP pick at this point as well, and it's not just because he's on top of the scoring race either, i've been saying that for weeks.
Though as for him playing in a market like Ottawa...well you could say the same thing about Alexander Ovechkin in Washington...or Ilya Kovalchuk in Atlanta...or Vincent Lecavalier in Tampa Bay. Two seasons ago Joe Thornton one the MVP (i still believe Jagr should of won that year) playing in California...
Anybody else see Kathleen Edwards sing the National Anthem at the All-Star? I think she did a decent job, in English and French. Better than Nelly Furtado did a few years back at the NBA AllStar game...WAY better.
das_hips Wrote:
LizardKing51 Wrote:This is one of the strangest things Ive ever seen in hockey..

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2008/01/24/peddie_fletcher_lipsynching/">http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2008/01/ ... psynching/</a><!-- m -->


Whats up with that? Confusedcratch:

Thats just too funny... :lol: :lol:

That's just ridiculous. While it is completely understandable that Peddie and Fletcher may have gone over the subtext of the declaration together, what followed (with the lip-synch support, and erroneous stare) provided a number of media-enticing, and potentially disturbing contextual scenarios, which some have eluded to previously.

I hope for the sake of the "Leafs Nation", that Fletcheddi picks a GM well suited for the development of a team from the bottom up. It's a painful process, but what does Fletcheddi and MLSE have to lose monetarily? Nothing. This isn't venture financing, this is blue-chip re-capitalization. Just get it over with so I don't have to hear about 'speculation', 'late third-period break-downs', or 'trade rumours' on SportsCentre anymore. Watching a veteran team in despair has become annoying; Watching a youthful team with vigilance, and drive, while losing or winning, at least provides promise and entertainment.

As well, I'd like to start a bi-weekly "Alfie for MVP" bi-dialogue, and I expect Cferneyh to second the movement. While I know the 'Sens Army' isn't well represented on this site, and small market teams like Ottawa generally get the shaft, I'm prepared for the lack of response, commentary, or rebuttal, but hope that Alfie continues to play with the determination he has had all season. I see plenty of Iginila (a mid-season MVP candidate), but when was the last time that a Senator's HNIC broadcast left the confines of the Nation's' Capital (excluding, of course, the Ottawa-Detroit game, where Alfredsson had a couple)? I imagine the team is a bit of mystery to most of Western Canada, and the GTA.

As Pierre McGuire (can't stand the guy) said on the Ottawa Sports Radio 1200 yesterday, Ottawa fans have to start cheering "MVP" instead of "Alfie" for the guy to even have a chance on the ballot. I think baldy is right.

Lecavalier, Ovechkin, and Iginla have all played better than Alfie this season. That 7 point game seems to have some people a little overjealous. :rambo: That's my take on it, anyway.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490