Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

The Order Of Canada
#1

Yeah...um....this Order of Canada thing is pretty moronic me thinks. This appointment of Mr. Morgentyler certainly doesn't evoke feelings of pride in my country.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/080702/national/order_of_cda_morgentaler">http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/0807 ... orgentaler</a><!-- m -->

"The safety and health of women has been preserved and I'm very proud of that."

That's great. I guess the safety and health of unborn babies isn't all that important, anyway. :?
Reply
#2

Can of worms=open

I'm not going to get into it with you, however; I totally and wholeheartedly disagree with your stance on the issue.
Reply
#3

Ditto. Neither of us will convince the other that his view on abortion is wrong.

However, Morgentaler has undeniably shown courage and determination, and furthermore he has been vindicated by parliament. I don't think the Order of Canada is out of place, on those grounds.
Reply
#4

skippy the wonder dog Wrote:Ditto. Neither of us will convince the other that his view on abortion is wrong.

However, Morgentaler has undeniably shown courage and determination, and furthermore he has been vindicated by parliament. I don't think the Order of Canada is out of place, on those grounds.


Well said Skippy :thumb:
Reply
#5

skippy the wonder dog Wrote:Ditto. Neither of us will convince the other that his view on abortion is wrong.

However, Morgentaler has undeniably shown courage and determination, and furthermore he has been vindicated by parliament. I don't think the Order of Canada is out of place, on those grounds.

What do you think about the argument that recipients of the Order should be people which all Canadians would unite around as 'distinguished' (the whole thing is really ambiguous and unimportant, anyway)? Some would say that, despite his 'courage,' Morgentaler remains a divisive character. Weak argument? Thoughts?

Jeff

June 21, 2003 Toronto, ON: SkyDome
July 1, 2004 Toronto, ON: Molson Amphitheatre
November 26, 2004 Toronto, ON: Air Canada Centre
June 24, 2006 Toronto, ON: Historic Fort York
May 10, 2007 Indianapolis, IN: The Vogue
July 14, 2011 Edmonton, AB: Northlands Festival Site
June 30, 2012 Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON: The Commons at Butler's Barracks
January 23, 2013 Edmonton, AB: Rexall Place
July 28, 2016 Edmonton, AB: Rexall Place
Reply
#6

I'd say that the notion of Canadians truly uniting around anyone of real substance is false.

What differs in this case is the nature of the controversy -- it's not a question of whether his contribution to Canada is significant enough to be recognized, but whether his contribution is appropriate. So I can sympathize with your line of argument.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)