Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

In View -- One Year Later
#46

Rock deserves some credit for rejuvenating things, getting the band to branch out, etc.

But he also made some pretty vile choices on this album. I'd rank it among their worst produced, which is too bad, because his creative contribution in other ways seems to have been pretty valuable.
Reply
#47

Well living in the UK i sure don't have to worry about any Hip track getting overplayed on the radio.

I like 'In View' I don't concider it a cheesy pop song at all, it's a pop song for sure but I don't think it's cheesy at all. It reminds of when Garbage (another band I enjoy) released 'Cherry Lips' a total pop song and alot of the fans thought they'd soldout - but again it was good pop, not cheesy rubbish like The Spice Girls or The Cheeky Girls.

As for WC itself I rate it as a lower than average Hip release, with the whiny 'Pretend' maybe being my least fav Hip song.
Reply
#48

I enjoy "in view", but it has become less listened to for me. The WC on a whole I think is a great cd. I personally love Rink, Fly, Drop Off, Kids, Family Band, Ocean, and I like Luv/ Last night I dreamed/ Pretend. To me that = great cd Big Grin Big Grin
Reply
#49

skippy the wonder dog Wrote:Rock deserves some credit for rejuvenating things, getting the band to branch out, etc.

But he also made some pretty vile choices on this album. I'd rank it among their worst produced, which is too bad, because his creative contribution in other ways seems to have been pretty valuable.

I know this has been discussed ad-nauseam, but I'm not going to sift through pages of posts to re-acquaint myself with your specific reasons as to what makes this record's production so poor in your view. I do recall that you aren't too keen on the big, dramatic "over-the-top" gloss of certain songs ("Pretend" & "World Container", perhaps?).

I understand what you mean in regards to those two tracks, specifically, but could it be that the root of what draws such criticism lies in that which you are praising here (rejuvenation / variation)? Because it seems to me that the arrangement / engineering of these tracks in particular is done specifically to accessorize the dramatic theme and concept of the pieces themselves, and are therefore quite fitting.

I'm not particulary fond of those two songs either, but it's certainly not because of production -- it's the overall concept / musical scheme that doesn't interest me.

But as far as the production itself -- I put WC at the top of the list, hands down. The percussion sounds so much fuller and more true-to-life on this Hip record than any other. The rest of the mixing also seems far and away more masterful; each instrument is clearly audible, yet they manage enhance one another and meld wonderfully, without distortion or cracking or hissing. The bass / guitar sounds are captured as well as I've heard on any hip album, too. In songs like "Fly", where there is an acoustic track underneath the electric tracks, you can FOR ONCE actually hear the chords being played, as opposed to just the clicking of the pick being dragged across the strings when overshadowed by more dominant electic sounds. The bass is strong and solid, and the vocals are sharp. The dynamic range is as wide on this record as any I've heard.

I was listening to this album on headphones recently, and couldn't believe how incredible it sounded, especially in comparison to some tunes from other Hip albums when interspersed.

I understand how certain works can benefit from more subdued or muddier, "raw" sounding production (see Day for Night), but Rock's work is optimal for the music on WC, imo.
Reply
#50

Fully Completely in my opinion is the best produced album they have !
Reply
#51

craigd Wrote:Fully Completely in my opinion is the best produced album they have !

ummm...are you kidding?
Reply
#52

Nope
Reply
#53

FC has some of the worst production on ANY CD i've ever heard..the remastering on Yer Faves was long overdue
Reply
#54

opiated Wrote:FC has some of the worst production on ANY CD i've ever heard..the remastering on Yer Faves was long overdue
You haven't heard Californication, Icky Thump, or Zeitgeist, have you?
Reply
#55

Well to each his own ...
FC spawned more singles than any other HIP album since.
5o Mission, Wheat Kings, Locked, 100th, Courage ...
As well, the song Fully Completely is still a big crowd favorite.
That album was a coming of age for the band.
And the sound on songs like Pigeon Camera, Eldorado is amazing.
Sorry you disagree man. But you're definetly entitled !
Peace out.
Reply
#56

craigd Wrote:Well to each his own ...
FC spawned more singles than any other HIP album since.
5o Mission, Wheat Kings, Locked, 100th, Courage ...
As well, the song Fully Completely is still a big crowd favorite.
That album was a coming of age for the band.
And the sound on songs like Pigeon Camera, Eldorado is amazing.
Sorry you disagree man. But you're definetly entitled !
Peace out.

It certainly boils down to personal taste....but does the success / popularity / quality of writing of the songs really relate to the production quality of the record?

I hate a love-hate relationship with the sound engineering of this record. To me it sounds unbalanced, flat, and uber "compressed". Baker's guitars sound awesome (like Pigeon Camera, for example), but that comes at the expense of a tinny, slappy-sounding snare drum, crackling and distorted cymbals, and a score of other imperfections...like too much reverb.
Reply
#57

I'm in Esthetes camp on this one. I love the record, the songs, etc, but hate the production.

The FC songs on Hipeponymous sound so much better.
Reply
#58

I agree. FC is my favourite Hip album I reckon, but after hearing a lot of the songs on YF first before hearing FC I was amazed at how poorly produced the orginals are - The whole thing sounds like it was recorded through a sock.

chris Wrote:I'm in Esthetes camp on this one. I love the record, the songs, etc, but hate the production.

The FC songs on Hipeponymous sound so much better.

Agreed on all counts. :thumb:
Reply
#59

A sock ??
I'm sure Chris Tsangarides will be happy with THAT comment !!
lmao
Reply
#60

Though it's funny that craig d. singles out "Pigeon Camera" and "Eldorado", because those are the only two on the record about which I can appreciate the style of production. I'm always locked in on Baker's lead in Pigeon, since it kicks so much ass, and it does sound silky-clean (it's gotta be a Strat, right?).

And with Eldorado, I love the solidity of the bass countered by the sweet punctuation of whatever that accenting percussion instrument is -- a triangle or some sort of chime (anybody know exactly what Johnny's using there?). Whatever it is, it sounds nice 'n' tight with the kick drum and Sinclair's bass, with the the guitars churning out that little methodical riff.....however, the snare drum still sounds like ass, like it does on all the FC songs....
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)