10-31-2012, 03:40 PM
Sherpa!!
Jenna_Bird Wrote:I am about to pee myself with glee. 15 more minutes of class until we're on our way to the Cleve. It will be interesting to see how they work their way through nearly 30 years of material. :jump I'm going to remain cautiously optomistic!Didn't know the tour started tonight until you said this! Have fun! Hope you get some Coconut Cream

pars9393 Wrote:im still not gonna look at the setlists until the toronto show, gonna be hell to not check
HandsInTheRiver41 Wrote:spottrax Wrote:Exactly. I can't believe that lighting would be used as an excuse for static setlists. I know it's an extreme example, but Phish have arguably some of the most varied setlists in rock, as well very engaging and complex light shows. Mind you, their lighting director (Chris Kuroda) is a legend, but it still strikes me as a very poor reason to not vary a setlist.WesleyC. Wrote:The only lighting production I have ever noticed with the Hip is during Blow at High Dough when they do the big intro rif and the lights all go on. with Last of the unplucked gems when gord sings "im kinda dumb and so are you" they have the lights shine out onto the audience. Other than that I dont really see the lights matching up to anything. A hamster could work the Hips light show.
I've seen every tour since the mid 90s and the Hip have always had either first class lighting or a capable lightman who knew all the songs and cues (when using the house light system). A few of tours, the lightshow was unreal (phantom power arena tour and the 09 club tour)... However, the lights would have nothing to do with inserting some album cuts in the setlist....not that complicated.
My hope is that this "setlist" was meant for festival-type gigs only and will not be indicative of the upcoming tour.
mintgreenbird Wrote:Worry not
grimes Wrote:mintgreenbird Wrote:Worry not
Indeed. This thread seems rather silly now, doesn't it?
HandsInTheRiver41 Wrote:They didn't play NOIS? That must be a first!