Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Dylan and the Foos: tour dates
#16

Dylan's new music video was just published on the web. I'm not quite sure what to think about it, but it stars Scarlett Johannson and was directed by Bennett Miller. You can also listen to the whole album:

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://music.aol.com/franchise/firstview/b">http://music.aol.com/franchise/firstview/b</a><!-- m -->
Reply
#17

If you want a bigger display than the AOL version,
http://youtube.com/watch?v=iBfTBagpAUY

I can't comment on the video. I'm still recovering from last night in Rochester. He was on fire.
Reply
#18

i was just down at the jlc here in london picking up my tickets for tonight's show... as i was walking back to my car 2 busses pulled into the back parking lot of the building... i stopped and out walked the foo fighters. they came over where another guy was standing waiting for them, chatted for a second and signed his record. i just stood there smiling (i'm not a big foos fan but i thought it was cool). i waited another few minutes to see if anyone would walk out of the other bus, but no bobby.

really looking forward to the show tonight... first dylan show!
Reply
#19

Lots of accounts from this tour of people meeting the Foos in bars after the show.

I was listening to Tuesday's and last Saturday's shows today ... the band is sounding good and the Bob is in good voice. Should be a good one.
Reply
#20

A damn fine show in Ottawa tonight. I really walked into this concert not knowing what to expect, being neither a huge Foo's fan, and having limited exposure to Dylan. I was quite surprised by the Foo's set, mostly because when I hear the term 'acoustic set', I expect there to be a complete shift in volume and energy, but from what I gathered, they excel with this type of environment. The extra four or so musicians really do add to a lot of their songs, and really diminished my pre-conceived notion of what an 'acoustic set' really is.

As for Dylan, all I can say is that his band is great. While Dylan certainly struggled at times at being either either lyrically audible, or on-key, his band really is a talented group of guys. Not knowing a lot of Dylan's work, I essentially sat there and listened to some incredible blues music (I was truly expecting a quiet, mundane folk atmosphere), and without a doubt witnessed one of the greatest rock drummers I have ever seen. I don't know who he is, or where he has been, but that drummer is ridiculous.

One question from a Dylan newbie. Does he always come across so cold? I mean, not a 'hello', not a 'thank you', and not a 'goodbye'. He didn't say a single word to the audience all night. I imagine he can't be like 90% of the 'base and hate Ottawa because of the hockey team that plays here, so I can only imagine that this is normal.
Reply
#21

das_hips Wrote:One question from a Dylan newbie. Does he always come across so cold? I mean, not a 'hello', not a 'thank you', and not a 'goodbye'. He didn't say a single word to the audience all night. I imagine he can't be like 90% of the 'base and hate Ottawa because of the hockey team that plays here, so I can only imagine that this is normal.

Yup, he is not one for normally talking much. But, he does usually introduce the band and make a really corny joke about one of them.

I've seen him about 20 times, the most talkative I ever remember him being was back in around 91 or so at the Okeeffe Centre (Hummingbird now). He basically introduced every song. Ron Hawkins also came out and they spoke a bit on stage together.

Man, I'm trying to remember the name of the girl that opened for him that night. Canadian, had a hit called "Dangerous Times"? She use to be a back up singer for Matt Minglewood? Anyone remember her?? She even sang back up for John Mellencamp singing "Leopard Skin Pillbox Hat" on the Dylan 30th Anniversary release?

Damn, what was her name??
Reply
#22

das_hips Wrote:As for Dylan, all I can say is that his band is great. While Dylan certainly struggled at times at being either either lyrically audible, or on-key, his band really is a talented group of guys. Not knowing a lot of Dylan's work, I essentially sat there and listened to some incredible blues music (I was truly expecting a quiet, mundane folk atmosphere), and without a doubt witnessed one of the greatest rock drummers I have ever seen. I don't know who he is, or where he has been, but that drummer is ridiculous.

George Recile. Dylan collects top-drawer studio musicians to tour with him, but this band is actually a step down from his best band, thanks to the loss of his best guitar duo ever, Larry Campbell and Charlie Sexton.

As for Bob Dylan struggling to sing on key, you must be joking. His singing at the moment is top-notch. He's not quacking out bum notes. I have no idea why people say he sings off key. You might not be able to make out what the words are, but he hits the notes.

And yeah, these days he never says anything to the audience, except to introduce the band.
Reply
#23

I'm sure I'm going to scolded by Skippy or anyone else abou this, but I hated, well hated to strong, i didnt like Bob Dylans portion of the show. The Foo's were incredible, i would have paid the 65 bucks to see them play the whole time.
I'm not a huge Dylan fan and I dont know a lot of his work, which i'm sure took away from my experience, but for him to not say anything at all. I'm pretty sure he didnt even introduce the band. He stood sideways the whole time, barely even looked at the crowd.

I think he was using his keyboard as a walker. My friend, and a couple people who called in on FM96 this morning (b/c they were lookin for callers who actually enjoyed the show), fell asleep.

Any time your falling asleep at a rock concert, something is wrong.

Like I said, i know i'm going to hear about this, yada yada yada, but this is my opinion.
Reply
#24

You either get it, or you don't. Dylan concerts always draw this reaction. Non-fans figure they want to go and see him, not knowing what to expect, and drag in expectations based on old recordings or the few songs they've heard on the radio.

What they get is a guy who refuses to address the audience playing arrangements that bear little resemblance to whatever was on the album. And then they complain that they went to see an artist they didn't know, and who they evidently didn't really like to start with, and wound up not liking the show.

What exactly did you expect?
Reply
#25

I went having no idea what to expect, and was looking forward to a great show. Which I'm sure a lot of ppl liked.

Listening to the radio, and the write up in the paper, it was not liked by many ppl at all. The free press guy who says hes been to numerous shows in the past, was not impressed at all.

And the radio go only 1 or 2 ppl who enjoyed the show out of however many who called.

I'm not saying it was a bad show, just saying it was "odd" and not greatly entertaining for me. i still have loads of respect for the guy and his music, and his fans of course.
Reply
#26

Bob Dylan is the man. He's just as good, if not better, now than he ever was. Have you heard his new album????It has some tracks on it that are better than anything he's done. He's always re-inventing himself....and even his old songs. What other band do you see doing that???None that I know of.
Reply
#27

Well, as I said, Dylan shows are always followed by a torrent of bad reviews.

You either get it, or you don't.
Reply
#28

bug_superstar79 Wrote:Bob Dylan is the man. He's just as good, if not better, now than he ever was. Have you heard his new album????It has some tracks on it that are better than anything he's done. He's always re-inventing himself....and even his old songs. What other band do you see doing that???None that I know of.

I have heard his new album. I love it, I listen to it all the time. Not saying I dont love Dylan, just didnt enjo the concert.
Reply
#29

d_alex_d Wrote:He stood sideways the whole time, barely even looked at the crowd.

I've never understood why this bothers people.

I couldn't care less whether or not an artist addresses the audience during a concert. Nine times out of ten, the stuff they blab about is better left unsaid, as far as I'm concerned.

Unless it's Tom Waits, where almost every utterance is either amusingly eccentric or flat-out comical.

Though I'll admit that it is both unprofessional and downright rude not to introduce the musicians with whom you share the stage.....
Reply
#30

Dylan did introduce the band. Always does.

It's usually the only time he speaks. He explained in his Rolling Stone interview this year that he just doesn't see any point in talking -- when you play 100-plus dates a year for 18 years straight, as he has, the whole "Hello, Cleveland!" thing starts to ring false.

It's pretty easy to sum up the negative reviews. In London, he did Desolation Row, which was 11 minutes on the album, no chorus, no bridge, words that don't appear to make much sense. Dropped one verse and added two guitar solos. Or It's All Right, Ma (I'm Only Bleedin'), with a stream of lyrics that flow out too swiftly to be grasped, prompting complaints about enunciation from people who have apparently forgotten that that's how it always was.

If you don't know those songs, and love those songs, and you couldn't hear what he was singing, well, it's pretty clear why you would complain to FM96 afterwards.

(While making your request for Nickelback. But now I'm just being mean.)

That probably accounts for most of the negative reactions. But the ovation he got at the end of the show suggests FM96's listeners might not be a representative sample.

The sound wasn't the best. But seriously, Alex, how could you not love the Nettie Moore he did?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)