Posts: 24
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
0
um, WATS is at 164
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/chart_display.jsp?cfi=292&cfgn=Albums&cfn=Billboard+Comprehensive+Albums&ci=3107602&cdi=10179743&cid=04%2F25%2F2009">http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/ ... F25%2F2009</a><!-- m -->
Posts: 6,734
Threads: 665
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation:
0
hiphockey Wrote:um, WATS is at 164
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/chart_display.jsp?cfi=292&cfgn=Albums&cfn=Billboard+Comprehensive+Albums&ci=3107602&cdi=10179743&cid=04%2F25%2F2009">http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/ ... F25%2F2009</a><!-- m -->
I am not sure of the difference between the "Billboard Top 200" (148) and the "Billboard Comprehensive Albums" (164)
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/chart_display.jsp?cfi=305&cfgn=Albums&cfn=The+Billboard+200&ci=3107606&cdi=10180040&cid=04%2F25%2F2009">http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/ ... F25%2F2009</a><!-- m -->
"We're forced to bed, but we're free to dream"
Dana
Posts: 1,374
Threads: 101
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation:
0
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Comprehensive_Albums">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_ ... ive_Albums</a><!-- m -->
Posts: 6,734
Threads: 665
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation:
0
mojo_mattv Wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_C...ive_Albums
"approximately twenty to thirty "catalog" albums that still sell well enough to be one of the top 200"
Thanks.
I guess there are 16 "legacy" albums that still sell better than a new release by The Hip.
"We're forced to bed, but we're free to dream"
Dana
Posts: 6,734
Threads: 665
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation:
0
Not to shabby after 3 weeks on the charts.
Week 1: #1
Week 2: #5
Week 3: #6
"We're forced to bed, but we're free to dream"
Dana