10-14-2008, 09:59 AM
Skippy, I don't remember arguing against the point that there is a need to reform the electoral system. I have no real qualms with the overall premise of the electoral system per se, or the way the electors are delegated; rather it is voter registration circus and the partisan wrangling over ballot administration, casting, and counting that continue to be a serious problems.
Look, it's not like I think the Dems are the only ones who are exploiting the weaknessess in the system and trying to capitalize on its flaws. I'd be ignorant to assume that only one party does it. However, it's not like there are any large, high-profile organizations turning in huge numbers of questionable or duplicate new registrations for lower-income rural Ohio voters. No, scores of registrations that are sending up red flags are from ACORN, an organization that is securely in the pocket of the Democratic presidential nominee.
And might I suggest that it's one thing for the losing side to cry 'foul' in desperation AFTER the the ballots are counted; it's another entirely to question suspiscious registrations a month, two months, three months in advance of Election Day.
Furthermore, this whole issue is exacerbated by Jennifer Brunner, Ohio's Secretary of State, who ran for office on the platform of "ensuring confidence in Ohio's elections", pledging that Ohio elections be "free, fair, open and honest". Yet a federal judge ruled that she was breaking the law by not allowing county election boards to cross-check questionable new registrations (a ruling which has since been overturned by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals). So much for her pledge of "transparency".
Even The Columbus Dispatch, a notorious liberal rag, asserts a lack of credibility in her office in a recent editorial.
And Phil, you can spout off as many outrageous overgeneralizations about how "Republicans hate low income people and don't want them to vote" you want, and you can parrot the tagline about how ACORN is a honest, by-the-book, "non-partisan" organization who is just trying to help people exercise their civil rights. That is your right.
But I have the right to answer with one of these: :roll:
And for the record, I don't even consider myself a "Republican". I probably lean to the right on more issues than I do to the left, but there are a number of issues where I do lean left, believe it or not. And I SO wish there were more independents running for offices. I can tell you that I will be voting for the independent candidate for the Ohio 2nd Congressional District race.
Look, it's not like I think the Dems are the only ones who are exploiting the weaknessess in the system and trying to capitalize on its flaws. I'd be ignorant to assume that only one party does it. However, it's not like there are any large, high-profile organizations turning in huge numbers of questionable or duplicate new registrations for lower-income rural Ohio voters. No, scores of registrations that are sending up red flags are from ACORN, an organization that is securely in the pocket of the Democratic presidential nominee.
And might I suggest that it's one thing for the losing side to cry 'foul' in desperation AFTER the the ballots are counted; it's another entirely to question suspiscious registrations a month, two months, three months in advance of Election Day.
Furthermore, this whole issue is exacerbated by Jennifer Brunner, Ohio's Secretary of State, who ran for office on the platform of "ensuring confidence in Ohio's elections", pledging that Ohio elections be "free, fair, open and honest". Yet a federal judge ruled that she was breaking the law by not allowing county election boards to cross-check questionable new registrations (a ruling which has since been overturned by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals). So much for her pledge of "transparency".
Even The Columbus Dispatch, a notorious liberal rag, asserts a lack of credibility in her office in a recent editorial.
And Phil, you can spout off as many outrageous overgeneralizations about how "Republicans hate low income people and don't want them to vote" you want, and you can parrot the tagline about how ACORN is a honest, by-the-book, "non-partisan" organization who is just trying to help people exercise their civil rights. That is your right.
But I have the right to answer with one of these: :roll:
And for the record, I don't even consider myself a "Republican". I probably lean to the right on more issues than I do to the left, but there are a number of issues where I do lean left, believe it or not. And I SO wish there were more independents running for offices. I can tell you that I will be voting for the independent candidate for the Ohio 2nd Congressional District race.

