[second_sight_kyle]

So what exactly are we disagreeing about?

Oh, yes. That would be the part where, without having actually read what was written, you bought into Tiger's straw men, falsely attributed the notion that people are "born gay" to his opponents, and misrepresented other arguments -- and then, when called on these mistakes, refused to admit your error and chose instead to attempt to blind us with science.

Which all amounts to what I'd call the classic Internet dominance display of the human male. But I forgive you, "Kyle," because I understand that you're a "prisoner" of your biology.

We were disagreeing about being prisoners of our biology and culture. At least until you said environment was synonymous with culture. Either way, I took my blinding science to be more representative of male Internet dominance than your folk theories about personality and prisoners.

I actually did go into how much of the thread my laziness allowed me to read. I can kick up the font size if you want. So for my first couple of posts in this thread, I made love to Tiger's Strawmen. But my blinding science powers and bullshit radar were still put to the test with the 'prisoners of biology and culture' comment. All this culminating in Kyle's internet dominance over you :mrgreen: