01-23-2005, 07:49 AM
Just curious what the forum thinks about the following story:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/sportsbusiness/news/story?id=1972279">http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/sportsbu ... id=1972279</a><!-- m -->
My take? I don't believe it was necessarily the right thing for the family to sue the concession company. I don't think they could have known their vendor got greedy and violated their policy on selling more beer than allowed. It is a tragedy but should the company be held responsible for the actions of an employee who most likely decided to ignore the policy on his own? My gut feeling is the concession company was sued because it has the deepest pockets and the most direct connection to the vendor.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/sportsbusiness/news/story?id=1972279">http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/sportsbu ... id=1972279</a><!-- m -->
My take? I don't believe it was necessarily the right thing for the family to sue the concession company. I don't think they could have known their vendor got greedy and violated their policy on selling more beer than allowed. It is a tragedy but should the company be held responsible for the actions of an employee who most likely decided to ignore the policy on his own? My gut feeling is the concession company was sued because it has the deepest pockets and the most direct connection to the vendor.

