Posts: 1,795
Threads: 95
Joined: Jun 2003
Reputation:
0
i am looking at this camera
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/proddetail.asp?logon=&langid=EN&dept=0&WLBS=fsweb17&sku_id=0665000FS10049110&catid=&newdeptid=14#">http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/prodde ... deptid=14#</a><!-- m -->
any thoughts?
Posts: 1,515
Threads: 125
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation:
0
A 3.2 megapixel camera is alright, Cannon makes printers though, so I'm not sure how good they'd be on a digital camera, however theyh are a respectable name, I'd go for it overall. The 2 'AA' battery thing stumps me, I'd think they would get eaten up in no time.
Posts: 2,211
Threads: 39
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation:
0
Canon may make printers, but they've made cameras since at least the 1930s, and they currently make the leading digitals for the professional market.
I can't tell you squat about that model, but Canon makes great cameras.
Posts: 461
Threads: 46
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
I'm not sure about that model, but I have the Canon S400 and I love it.
I'd spend the extra cash and get a decent one as it will last you longer.
And Mark, Canon was in the camera business well before anyone had even heard of injet printers, or even computers for anyone but Nasa
Posts: 690
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2003
Reputation:
0
aaronck Wrote:...I'd spend the extra cash and get a decent one as it will last you longer...
I use a Canon Powershot A80
(cNet Review) and I'm very happy with the simplicity, functionability, and picture quality. I shot over 250 Hi-Res pics (using a 256 MB card, not included) at the Detroit show and didn't drain the batteries (4 AA). It works well as a "point & shoot" on automatic and has 13 different individually adjustable settings such as AV,TV, night, macro, portrait, panorama, etc.
I'm not sure what it runs north of the border, but it's a few months old and I paid around $250. It may not seem like much, but there's a huge difference between 3.2 MP and 4.0 MP, just like there is between 4, 5, & 6 MP.
If you haven't already seen them, check these
examples.
1995-04-07 Toledo | 1996-06-29 Toledo | 1996-11-23 Detroit | 1998-08-22 Toledo | 1999-02-12 Auburn Hills |
1999-05-05 Grand Rapids | 1999-07-31 Clarkston | 1999-12-31 Toronto | 2000-01-01 Toronto |
2000-06-14 Pontiac | 2000-07-15 Clarkston | 2000-12-02 Detroit | 2002-08-31 Clarkston |
2004-09-18 Detroit | 2007-04-12 Detroit | 2009-05-29 Detroit | 2012-11-28 Detroit | 2016-08-08 London | 2016-08-16 Hamilton
Posts: 1,795
Threads: 95
Joined: Jun 2003
Reputation:
0
thanks for the help guys.
should i be concered that it uses SD memory cards? does that really matter?
Posts: 917
Threads: 76
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation:
0
I checked a digital camera review website that I use time to time. They have it listed as "Expected not released" Not sure what that means.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/</a><!-- m -->
High
Posts: 690
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2003
Reputation:
0
I believe the only concern may be that SD (secure digital) cards are typically a little more expensive than CF (compact flash). In my case, a 256 MB SD card cost 40% more than a 256 MB CF card. As I understand it, it's because the SD "footprint" is so much smaller than the CF. As long as you don't intend to use multiple cards for storage media and instead upload pics to your PC, either should work just as well and the investment is justified.
1995-04-07 Toledo | 1996-06-29 Toledo | 1996-11-23 Detroit | 1998-08-22 Toledo | 1999-02-12 Auburn Hills |
1999-05-05 Grand Rapids | 1999-07-31 Clarkston | 1999-12-31 Toronto | 2000-01-01 Toronto |
2000-06-14 Pontiac | 2000-07-15 Clarkston | 2000-12-02 Detroit | 2002-08-31 Clarkston |
2004-09-18 Detroit | 2007-04-12 Detroit | 2009-05-29 Detroit | 2012-11-28 Detroit | 2016-08-08 London | 2016-08-16 Hamilton
Posts: 1,795
Threads: 95
Joined: Jun 2003
Reputation:
0
yeah. the SD cards are cheap. 521MB is only $72.99
Posts: 8,614
Threads: 451
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation:
0
I suggest you spend a couple bucks more and get a camera that uses rechargeable Lithium Ion batteries. As well, look into a camera that can handle TIFF's as well as JPEG's - unless you are only intending to post your pics on the web, and print at smaller sizes.
Furthermore, I read (and I can't find the article right now) that the digital camera industry is moving to standadized memory - and IIRC they are going with SD instead of CF. Check that out if you plan on keeping it for a longer period of time.
Posts: 3,175
Threads: 692
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation:
0
I have a A80 aswell, great camera. Highly recommend any Canon product.
I need 2 Kingston Tickets, please help.