Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

NEW. RADIOHEAD. OCT 10th
#1

Quote:Radiohead Announce New Album – 'In Rainbows'
by Daniel Zugna - October 1 2007


Radiohead's seventh album will be called 'In Rainbows', and will be available for download on the band's official website from October 10.


Not long after an unofficial new album website was revealed as a hoax, the band's radiohead.com space was updated with release information about the new album.

The band are asking fans how much they'd like to pay for the file download, with the price field left blank alongside a disclaimer "it's up to you".

The album can also be purchased as a £40 made-to order discbox, which according to the site "consists of the new album, in rainbows, on CD and on 2 x 12 inch heavyweight vinyl records. A second, enhanced CD contains more new songs, along with digital photographs and artwork. The discbox also includes artwork and lyric booklets. All are encased in a hardback book and slipcase."


The tracklisting for 'In Rainbows' is as follows:

15 Step
Bodysnatchers
Nude
Weird Fishes / Arpeggi
All I Need
Faust Arp
Reckoner
House Of Cards
Jigsaw Falling Into Place
Videotape



christmas just came two months early this year. OMG YES!
Reply
#2

Here's todays Lefsetz letter about this topic:

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.inrainbows.com/Store/index.html">http://www.inrainbows.com/Store/index.html</a><!-- m -->

Is this real?

I'm standing in Gelson's, shopping for dinner, and my BlackBerry starts to go wild. All with the above link. About a new Radiohead record.

Then I get in front of a computer and I read that there's been a hoax. That the site purporting to count down to Radiohead's release is fake. But now everybody is saying the story at the ABOVE link is REAL! That the new Radiohead album comes out in ten days and you can pay whatever you want. It's even on the Record Of The Day site.

Huh?

I got a call from the AP just last week. Asking me what Radiohead would do. I said they'd use the English indie model. License the record to a major for a limited period of time for a ton of bread. You see majors OWN physical distribution. And that's where the lion's share of recorded music revenue still is, in CDs, at Best Buy/Wal-Mart and the other brick and mortars left. The majors can get the product in the store and you can get paid. They need the billing. You still can't do it alone, even though it's been thirty plus years since the Dead failed with "Wake Of The Flood". Hell, PEARL JAM made a deal with a major.

But what if they're not? What if RADIOHEAD is giving the major labels the middle finger? What if they're saying WE'RE RICH ENOUGH! That the Net allows you to go straight to your audience. FUCK the middleman who says he's so necessary.

R.E.M. went for the cash They could have gone indie. Turns out re-signing with Warner was a good move, for they never sold tonnage again, despite getting PAID for selling tonnage. Springsteen went for the check. As did Neil Young.

But none of the foregoing acts are in their prime. They're riding off into the sunset. They don't have a hold on the younger generation. Boomers in Bimmers are the fans of these acts, none of whom can sell big numbers anyway. They're all on victory lap tours, raking in the dough for retirement. Radiohead doesn't have their dough...shouldn't they be going for the CHECK?

Isn't that the majors' advantage, they've got the money, they can write the CHECK?

Who leaves money on the table. Certainly not the agents. They don't want StubHub to steal a single dollar from their bottom line. Fuck image and credibility, THAT'S MY MONEY! I'm gonna make a deal with Cadillac. I'm gonna whore my product out on TV. Radio won't play my music, I can't get it on the Top Forty, MY HANDS ARE TIED!

It's not like Radiohead's living in a different world. But they're playing by a different rule book. One that says the money flows from the music, that people have to believe in you, that you've got to treat them right.

Shit, you can barely get a ticket to a Radiohead show. The venues aren't big and the demand is incredible. They're doing it all wrong, don't they see??

Well, obviously they don't.

This is big news. This says the major labels are fucked. Untrustworthy with a worthless business model. Radiohead doesn't seem to care if the music is free. Not that they believe it will be. Because believers will give you ALL THEIR MONEY!

This is the industry's worst nightmare. Superstar band, THE superstar band, forging ahead by its own wits. Proving that others can too. And they will.

This is what happens when you sell twenty dollar CDs with one good track and sue your customers for trading P2P. This is what happens when you believe you're ENTITLED to your business. This is what happens when music is a second-class citizen only interested in the bottom line.

There's no testimonial to Jimmy Iovine on inrainbows.com. No thanks to Rick Rubin, never mind Lyor Cohen. Radiohead doesn't need those stinkin' badges. They're THINKING FOR THEMSELVES!

What did that button say back in the sixties? "Question Authority"? That's what Radiohead is doing here. They're not holding back, saying their hands are tied, but are forging into the future.

You can't make a TV show by yourself. Certainly not a movie. Not that anyone can see. But you can make a record all by your lonesome, it doesn't cost that much. And you can say exactly what you want, you don't need to clean it up for Wal-Mart. And, you can distribute it yourself online. That's what Radiohead is doing.

Will they make a deal with a major for physical distribution? Will they do it themselves? Or will they leave ALL that money on the table? Shit, that would blow MY mind.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.recordoftheday.com/cgi-bin/rotd-mb/rotd_config.pl?read=123608">http://www.recordoftheday.com/cgi-bin/r ... ead=123608</a><!-- m -->

(You can pay as little as 1p for the download album, but a 45p credit card charge will be added.)
Reply
#3

This is all kinds of WTF. As much as I'd like to order the special edition, $80 for a Radiohead album just doesn't seem like a reasonable expense at the moment. Maybe I'll lay a few bucks down on the official download, so I don't feel as guilty for downloading the second disc further down the road.

Interesting business model, anyway.

Oh, incidentally, here are the full details:

You can pre-order it from their website right now as a download or a "discbox." What's a discbox? Why, it's pretty sweet:

"THIS CONSISTS OF THE NEW ALBUM, IN RAINBOWS, ON CD AND ON 2 X 12 INCH HEAVYWEIGHT VINYL RECORDS.
A SECOND, ENHANCED CD CONTAINS MORE NEW SONGS, ALONG WITH DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND ARTWORK.
THE DISCBOX ALSO INCLUDES ARTWORK AND LYRIC BOOKLETS.
ALL ARE ENCASED IN A HARDBACK BOOK AND SLIPCASE.
THE ALBUM DOWNLOAD AUTOMATICALLY COMES WITH THIS PACK."

Tracklists:

CD one and vinyl:

01 15 STEP
02 BODYSNATCHERS
03 NUDE
04 WEIRD FISHES/ARPEGGI
05 ALL I NEED
06 FAUST ARP
07 RECKONER
08 HOUSE OF CARDS
09 JIGSAW FALLING INTO PLACE
10 VIDEOTAPE

CD two and vinyl:

01 MK 1
02 DOWN IS THE NEW UP
03 GO SLOWLY
04 MK 2
05 LAST FLOWERS
06 UP ON THE LADDER
07 BANGERS AND MASH
08 4 MINUTE WARNING

You can theoretically register/buy at <!-- w --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.inrainbows.com">www.inrainbows.com</a><!-- w -->, but it's (not surprisingly) already been wiped off the face of the internet due to excess traffic.
Reply
#4

wow, from being a year away to being 10 days away. there is a god.
Reply
#5

daylight Wrote:You can theoretically register/buy at <!-- w --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.inrainbows.com">www.inrainbows.com</a><!-- w -->, but it's (not surprisingly) already been wiped off the face of the internet due to excess traffic.
The site works fine for me...

2004-12-03 - Saint John/2005-09-03 - Moncton/2006-06-30 - Charlottetown/2006-11-09/10 - Montreal/2007-09-11 - Fredericton/2007-09-13 - Halifax/2007-09-14 - Sydney/2007-09-15 - Charlottetown/2008-06-30 - Charlottetown/2009-05-01/02 - Montreal/2011-06-28 - Moncton/2011-06-30 - Charlottetown/2012-06-30 - Niagara-on-the-Lake/2013-02-01 - Moncton/2013-02-02 - Halifax/2015-01-10 - Toronto/2015-02-20 - Montreal/2015-07-17 - Ottawa/2016-08-18 - Ottawa/2016-08-20 - Kingston
Reply
#6

Well, it was down for a good bit of time this morning. Guess they underestimated their own popularity.
Reply
#7

It's still there for me... but unbelievably slow to load.
Reply
#8

chris Wrote:Here's todays Lefsetz letter about this topic:

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.inrainbows.com/Store/index.html">http://www.inrainbows.com/Store/index.html</a><!-- m -->

Is this real?

I'm standing in Gelson's, shopping for dinner, and my BlackBerry starts to go wild. All with the above link. About a new Radiohead record.

Then I get in front of a computer and I read that there's been a hoax. That the site purporting to count down to Radiohead's release is fake. But now everybody is saying the story at the ABOVE link is REAL! That the new Radiohead album comes out in ten days and you can pay whatever you want. It's even on the Record Of The Day site.

Huh?

I got a call from the AP just last week. Asking me what Radiohead would do. I said they'd use the English indie model. License the record to a major for a limited period of time for a ton of bread. You see majors OWN physical distribution. And that's where the lion's share of recorded music revenue still is, in CDs, at Best Buy/Wal-Mart and the other brick and mortars left. The majors can get the product in the store and you can get paid. They need the billing. You still can't do it alone, even though it's been thirty plus years since the Dead failed with "Wake Of The Flood". Hell, PEARL JAM made a deal with a major.

But what if they're not? What if RADIOHEAD is giving the major labels the middle finger? What if they're saying WE'RE RICH ENOUGH! That the Net allows you to go straight to your audience. f**k the middleman who says he's so necessary.

R.E.M. went for the cash They could have gone indie. Turns out re-signing with Warner was a good move, for they never sold tonnage again, despite getting PAID for selling tonnage. Springsteen went for the check. As did Neil Young.

But none of the foregoing acts are in their prime. They're riding off into the sunset. They don't have a hold on the younger generation. Boomers in Bimmers are the fans of these acts, none of whom can sell big numbers anyway. They're all on victory lap tours, raking in the dough for retirement. Radiohead doesn't have their dough...shouldn't they be going for the CHECK?

Isn't that the majors' advantage, they've got the money, they can write the CHECK?

Who leaves money on the table. Certainly not the agents. They don't want StubHub to steal a single dollar from their bottom line. f**k image and credibility, THAT'S MY MONEY! I'm gonna make a deal with Cadillac. I'm gonna whore my product out on TV. Radio won't play my music, I can't get it on the Top Forty, MY HANDS ARE TIED!

It's not like Radiohead's living in a different world. But they're playing by a different rule book. One that says the money flows from the music, that people have to believe in you, that you've got to treat them right.

Shit, you can barely get a ticket to a Radiohead show. The venues aren't big and the demand is incredible. They're doing it all wrong, don't they see??

Well, obviously they don't.

This is big news. This says the major labels are fucked. Untrustworthy with a worthless business model. Radiohead doesn't seem to care if the music is free. Not that they believe it will be. Because believers will give you ALL THEIR MONEY!

This is the industry's worst nightmare. Superstar band, THE superstar band, forging ahead by its own wits. Proving that others can too. And they will.

This is what happens when you sell twenty dollar CDs with one good track and sue your customers for trading P2P. This is what happens when you believe you're ENTITLED to your business. This is what happens when music is a second-class citizen only interested in the bottom line.

There's no testimonial to Jimmy Iovine on inrainbows.com. No thanks to Rick Rubin, never mind Lyor Cohen. Radiohead doesn't need those stinkin' badges. They're THINKING FOR THEMSELVES!

What did that button say back in the sixties? "Question Authority"? That's what Radiohead is doing here. They're not holding back, saying their hands are tied, but are forging into the future.

You can't make a TV show by yourself. Certainly not a movie. Not that anyone can see. But you can make a record all by your lonesome, it doesn't cost that much. And you can say exactly what you want, you don't need to clean it up for Wal-Mart. And, you can distribute it yourself online. That's what Radiohead is doing.

Will they make a deal with a major for physical distribution? Will they do it themselves? Or will they leave ALL that money on the table? Shit, that would blow MY mind.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.recordoftheday.com/cgi-bin/rotd-mb/rotd_config.pl?read=123608">http://www.recordoftheday.com/cgi-bin/r ... ead=123608</a><!-- m -->

(You can pay as little as 1p for the download album, but a 45p credit card charge will be added.)

No, Radiohead "doesn't have their dough". Not at all. Confusedcratch: Confusedcratch:
Reply
#9

tigerthelion... please elaborate as your comment totally confused me.
Reply
#10

chris Wrote:tigerthelion... please elaborate as your comment totally confused me.

I agree with tigerthelion, that statement made me read it twice, too.

He's saying, that Lefsetz is implying that Radiohead hasn't made bigtime coin. That REM, Springsteen and Neil Young all made a lot of money and can ride around signing on a label for a lot of money.

Where...clearly Thom Yorke isn't in danger of starving anytime soon. I think Lefsetz's point is kinda lost there...although I see the point, he doesn't do a good job of illustrating it by insinuating Radiohead is less wealthy or something than heritage acts.
Reply
#11

Graham Wrote:
chris Wrote:tigerthelion... please elaborate as your comment totally confused me.

I agree with tigerthelion, that statement made me read it twice, too.

He's saying, that Lefsetz is implying that Radiohead hasn't made bigtime coin. That REM, Springsteen and Neil Young all made a lot of money and can ride around signing on a label for a lot of money.

Where...clearly Thom Yorke isn't in danger of starving anytime soon. I think Lefsetz's point is kinda lost there...although I see the point, he doesn't do a good job of illustrating it by insinuating Radiohead is less wealthy or something than heritage acts.

Yeah, that was pretty much my point. The writer is insituating that Radiohead should be going with a big time label to get the big money. He's implying...actually he's not implying at all; he's flat out saying that Radiohead hasn't made a lot of money yet.
Reply
#12

Huh? Where does he say Radiohead hasn't made a lot of money? He's simply saying that they are leaving a ton of money on the table by not going for THE CHECK (i.e. the big-ass end of career recording contract that the other artists he mentioned went for). And he's right. I bet Radiohead could have smashed all kinds of records if they put their services up to bid on.
Reply
#13

Radiohead could have made a HUGE amount of cash if they wanted to get involved in a bidding war..however, they haven't done anything "brilliant" since OK Computer
Reply
#14

opiated Wrote:Radiohead could have made a HUGE amount of cash if they wanted to get involved in a bidding war..however, they haven't done anything "brilliant" since OK Computer

spot on.

Imagine a world before the "beginning was the word.”
Reply
#15

cferneyh Wrote:Huh? Where does he say Radiohead hasn't made a lot of money? He's simply saying that they are leaving a ton of money on the table by not going for THE CHECK (i.e. the big-ass end of career recording contract that the other artists he mentioned went for). And he's right. I bet Radiohead could have smashed all kinds of records if they put their services up to bid on.

I dunno. Maybe by saying, "Radiohead doesn't have their dough." Although, I can see that maybe I misunderstood the point of the author. Either way, Radiohead has charged enough for concert tickets over the years that I don't think of them as some sort of heroes for what they're doing with their new music. They made terrible music for the better part of the last ten years and got paid for it so... Big Grin
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)