tigerthelion Wrote:Wrong. Why would the game be over? They still had to stop NO from getting a first down anyway. They could have used their two timeouts and hoped to stop Deuce from running for a first down. Then NO would have attempted a FG. There would be time left on the clock for the Eagles to drive down the field in hopes of a touchdown. Actually, maybe NO would have missed the fg attempt and then Philly would have been in even better condition. Barring a touchdown by New Orleans, field position was almost irrelevant.
With all due respect, how can you say that I'm "wrong"? Remember that guys like Andy Reid are where they are because they have far better credentials in making these decisions than you or I. I feel much more confident siding with the professional elite than I would with my complete lack of credentials in coordinating an NFL offense.
Now -- If New olreans kicks a FG, the Eagles would have had about 0:45 to drive the length of the field, with NO timeouts, to score a touchdown.
That would take a virtual miracle. Good luck with all that.
Reid's realistic choices were:
1. Try to convert a highly improbable 4th & 15 own conversion, and in the event it fails, hope to stop three runs
and force a missed FG, and hope to gain 40 yards on the ensuing possession with no timeouts in less than a minute and kick the tying field goal.
-or-
2. Punt, hope to force a three and out, and hope to gain 40 yards on the ensuing possession with no timeouts in less than a minute and kick the tying field goal.
I'm pretty sure that a concensus of experienced coaching staffs would go with option #2. Reid knows his team better than any of us. I'm sure he and his staff thought that there was virtually no chance of converting that 4th down, and wasn't going to then
pray for a missed FG if they could stop the Saints rushers.