Posts: 1,365
Threads: 71
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation:
0
Escape@Hand Wrote:Hmmm...got the album tonight and gave it two listens; I don't think I've ever been so angry about an album after the first listen before. I really hated it. But I knew I had to listen to it more, and put on my good headphones, pulled out the liner notes and read the lyrics along with each song. I've warmed up to it a bit, but I still think it's the worst album they have put out in a long time, perhaps ever. I'm really struggling to connect to any of the songs - there are few if any hooks, everything is atmospheric at the expense of the solid, rocking rhythm they are famous for, and the songs are dominated by "drum and bass" style production and arrangement at the expense of the dual guitar sound that makes the band what it is.
There are only three songs that grab me at all, "World Possessed...", "Here, In the Dark" and "Machine", although all three leave something to be desired. When I first heard "Possessed", I didn't care for it much; after a few more listens it grew on me, and I like the song now, but it's dying for an anthemic, massive ending - with Johnny Fay pounding away on his kit, while the rest of the boys rock out - however, it just fizzles out instead. "Here, In the Dark" has a really cool grove, but it seems a little "schizophrenic" to me at times. "Machine" is cool, but again, it could have been epic and settles for something less. It is as though they got caught up trying to be "hip", with lots of weird, random, computer generated sounds and effects, at the expense of solid writing and arranging. There aren't any other songs that speak to me at all, at least at this point in time, unfortunately.
I'm curious to see how they treat these songs live; I think "Possessed" and "Machine" could be epic, but the rest of the album seems to be so dependent on things outside of the band to make them what they are it will be difficult for them to reproduce it in front of an audience. I'm guessing that Kevin Drew and Dave Hamelin had a heavy hand in this, and I really think they should have kept their hands off.
Also, there isn't any remarkable musical performance from the band members, it's just all these little parts thrown together, mixed in with a bunch of sound effects. It's in stark contrast to the band's work with Bob Rock; I've been listening to WATS a lot lately (oddly enough, an album that I didn't fully appreciate when it first came out), and while the complaints about the over-production are merited, Bob got amazing performances from each of the members. Gord's best singing can be found on that album - "Honey, Please" in particular - and Johnny Fay was a beast on the drums, with some great guitar work from Robbie Baker. MMP seems like the exact opposite. There is nothing that excites me performance wise on this album; it feels mundane, and boring. I hope that the rest of the album grows on me like "Possessed" has, but even then, I don't think it stands up very well to the rest of their discography. I remember when I heard "Tired as F..." and hoping that the rest of the album wasn't like those first two singles, however, it seems as though my worst fears have been realized. I hope we get at least one more album after this, so they can hopefully move in a different direction, where the strengths of the band are highlighted, not put in a time-out in the corner.
And if you think I'm pinning for "the good old days" of UPT and Road Apples - and while I certainly love me some good rock tunes - my favourite HIp songs are some of their more "off the beaten path" types..."Dark Canuck" would probably be my #1, "Escape @ Hand" (obviously), "New Maybe", "No Threat" and "Morning Moon" all rank highly for me as well. I just can't help to think that the band has been neutered on this record. 
Its good to see a fans honest opinion in a forum like this. I've gone through these songs a few times and now thinking what a remarkable gift we have with this release. I am certain there is no "free pass" going on with music that stimulates and moves me, and in this case there is a lot of that going on. The ending Ocean Next and Machine are on me like a rash. On another note, as mentioned before the Sirus XM track by track interview with Mr Baker was very cool, we inadvertently tuned into it on our way to the City & Colour show last night. Happy to hear him mention there is a "shadow" album that is recorded with every release, and that sometime in the future they may see the light of day.
"we've only got three hundred feet to go ..."
Posts: 892
Threads: 32
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation:
0
'Shadow' records...we can only dream about a Hip equivalent of Dylan's 'Bootleg Series' releases. Who knows, maybe it'll come to pass eventually...
It makes me nervous when artists say that given song or album is 'too personal' for public release. Sometimes that means they're withholding their most heartfelt work in favour of maintaining a persona that they feel is expected. Buck 65 once almost left a song about his mother's death off an album for just that reason. After it became a key track in his career, one that won him many new fans, he took his earlier doubts as proof that he'd had his artistic priorities backwards. Hopefully the Hip are not making a similar mistake.
Now then, as for MMP, my two cents. For those who are unenthused about the album, I suspect the root cause is simple: the rampant and extreme use of reverb on Gord's vocals throughout the record. There's nothing wrong at all with these songs, many of which are classic, catchy Hip - the hooks are there, actually - but never has there been a Hip album whose potential hit songs have been so subverted by production (and yes, I'll include Bob Rock's abominations in that statement). 'In Sarnia' is the biggest casualty - a great little Can-pop gem, but the vocals, harsh in the chorus to begin with, are distorted in a way that makes them even harsher, almost so as to resemble one of those 1980s productions that everyone now winces at. It's like they're just throwing away an automatic Hip Anthem. Extreme Reverb would be my alternate title for this album. I don't understand why this was felt to be necessary, except in specific cases ('Man,' for instance, is an art-rock opener well suited to that treatment, and in 'Ocean' the distortion seems to be part of the point, a bit like U2's 'Zoo Station'). It's too bad that the songs have to fight through all the distortion in order to be appreciated for what they are.
But I'll reiterate that AS SONGS these are mostly excellent. 'Possessed,' 'What Blue,' 'In Sarnia,' 'Here in the Dark' (a lost Pursuit of Happiness number!) and 'Machine' would be strong cuts on ANY Hip album. 'Tired' makes a lot more sense on the record than as a single (which I suspected would be the case). I have to give 'Great Soul,' 'Hot Mic' and 'Ocean Next' more listens; they seem awfully prog-rock to me, on initial acquaintance, almost like Rush songs in some aspects. Some will like that, but I mostly hate prog-rock...
If you're like me and think that a lot of these songs are perversely produced, you probably want to hear them live. This might also be the Hip album that will benefit the most from being taken on the road, away from all the reverb - unless they try to be 'faithful' to those effects on stage.
(Final thought, for now: there's a certain poetry in Johnny Fay, who was something of a handicap on record early on, being foregrounded on what stands to be the final Hip album. One thing's for sure, this is without question the Hip record most likely to be sampled in a future hip hop song!!)
Posts: 1,365
Threads: 71
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation:
0
This!!
"we've only got three hundred feet to go ..."
Posts: 6,675
Threads: 359
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
0
Totally agree with the reverb comment. It's probably my only real complaint with the album, especially it's excessive use on In Sarnia. Great post, KWT.
Posts: 43
Threads: 2
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
0
It's funny how production makes or breaks an album for people. Obviously, I hated what Rock did. I'll never get past the overproduction, but I am really digging what Drew and Hamelin did here. The reverb doesn't bother me in the least and adds something new that I think completely works.
Posts: 86
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
0
Beauty must be in the ear of the beholder . I find wats completely unlistenable. And I have to admit that my mind may really want to love this due to the circumstances. But, 6 of the 10 songs are really good or great. Machine is a great tune. I'm not getting tired of it and I really haven't loved anything they put out for a very long time. Nfpa was okay for a minute. Don smith is dead and gone. I'd love to hear them record another road apples. Dfn is my favorite by far. But this is sort of in this strange sweet spot for the band. Like they dialed back the crap and didn't quite go back to basics. Maybe a phantom power era feel to it. I dig it'.
Posts: 592
Threads: 40
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation:
0
I think everyone has been listening to this album for 1 or 2 days at most - maybe give it some time...like 3 days?
Posts: 55
Threads: 2
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
0
Hot Mic is maybe the only song I don't love. And I kind of dislike it.
Posts: 25
Threads: 3
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation:
0
I couldn't agree with Dire Wolf more, I feel the album is there best work since Phantom Power.
It's the first one I haven't had to "warm up to" since Day For Night and the first one I won't be skipping over any tracks while listening since Fully Completely.
I think we all wanted to love this release given the circumstances and I initially found it difficult to temper those emotions with a honest evaluation of this work. Personally, I enjoy every aspect of this album. The lyrics, music and production.
It's so good, in fact, I couldn't choose a favourite song or a weakest song if I wanted to.
The material will be smoking live, can't wait.