04-29-2009, 02:11 PM
For everyone who is complaining about Bob Rock's production - I seriously think we are listening to different albums - of course I have awesome taste...
cygnus8595 Wrote:I can't take a critic seriously when they spell the lead singer's name wrong.
cygnus8595 Wrote:I can't take a critic seriously when they spell the lead singer's name wrong.That is exactly what I was going to say!!
The Horrible Esthete Wrote:cygnus8595 Wrote:I can't take a critic seriously when they spell the lead singer's name wrong.
Agreed.
I also can't take a review seriously when the "author" writes like an 8th-grader.
BakersBrew Wrote:The best article to date. It is objective and speaks the unfortunate truth. The more I listen to this record, the more it sounds like it was made for a teenage audience. There are a couple of tunes that really interest me, but, as with World Container, I find myself constantly skipping songs that I dont want to hear. I have been to 102 shows since 1989, and consider myself a diehard. But, I also appreciate people that are honest. The Hip really need to address their next production and that is if they stick together after this one. Hopefully Bob Rock makes another lovefest with Metallica coming out of rehab that will take up the next 5 years of his life. You are a shit musician Bob, and that influence has apparently carried over to your producer's role.
The Horrible Esthete Wrote:How exactly does he sound like an 8th grader, though? I wish I knew all those words in the 8th grade. I've never heard an 8th grader call someone a "poet laureate" before.cygnus8595 Wrote:I can't take a critic seriously when they spell the lead singer's name wrong.
Agreed.
I also can't take a review seriously when the "author" writes like an 8th-grader.
cortezthekiller Wrote:I agree that the cokemachineglow interview was a great review. The guitars took a backseat on this album, and too often keys were way too prevalent. I don't know about everyone else, but I thought that the Hip were a guitar-based group. :what I mean, I don't hate keys, when they fit the song, but anyway..... I'm not quite as negative about the record as the cmg reviewere, but I can see where he's coming from in his review and he makes valid points, IMO. I do disagree with you about who this album was made for though. To me, this album sounds like it was made more for 40 year olds than for teenagers.
As for someone calling Bob Rock a genius, I can't agree with that, but that's just my personal tastes I suppose. It's clear that some Hip fans love Bob's work and that's great. To me, I think WC is a decent album in spite of Bob Rock. I think one listen to a live version of the title track compared to the studio version makes that point abundantly clear. WC is a great song, and sounds incredible when it's not being drowned out by over the top, Queen-like production. WATS is a decent album, with some beautiful songs, but I actually think that Gord's lyrical contribution to this record is pretty weak in comparison to some of his other work. I can also understand how a reviewer would say that the musicians sound like session players.
NegPhil Wrote:BLURT
blurt-online.com
Tragically Hip-We Are the Same Review
sherpa Wrote:cortezthekiller Wrote:I agree that the cokemachineglow interview was a great review. The guitars took a backseat on this album, and too often keys were way too prevalent. I don't know about everyone else, but I thought that the Hip were a guitar-based group. :what I mean, I don't hate keys, when they fit the song, but anyway..... I'm not quite as negative about the record as the cmg reviewere, but I can see where he's coming from in his review and he makes valid points, IMO. I do disagree with you about who this album was made for though. To me, this album sounds like it was made more for 40 year olds than for teenagers.
As for someone calling Bob Rock a genius, I can't agree with that, but that's just my personal tastes I suppose. It's clear that some Hip fans love Bob's work and that's great. To me, I think WC is a decent album in spite of Bob Rock. I think one listen to a live version of the title track compared to the studio version makes that point abundantly clear. WC is a great song, and sounds incredible when it's not being drowned out by over the top, Queen-like production. WATS is a decent album, with some beautiful songs, but I actually think that Gord's lyrical contribution to this record is pretty weak in comparison to some of his other work. I can also understand how a reviewer would say that the musicians sound like session players.
I'm not sure how one would think that this album isn't a guitar based album. The same way Harvest is a guitar based album. Actually there are a lot of similaries from the countryesque songs (Morning Moon, Harvest) to rockers (Love Is A Curse, Alabama) to orchestrated rock (Depression Suite/Country Day, There's A World/A Man Needs A Maid).
As far as it sounding like session players...You got me there - I don't see how one would even consider this to be a reasonable statement? Why do they sound like this? No reason or justification given and a completely idiotic statement in my opinion (not yours cortez but Jason Lewis). I don't know who Jason Lewis is but he sounds like one of the frat boy beer swilling HIPHIPHIPHIP drunken idiots you see too often at shows who are pining for another Little Bones and are fearful of anthing with sentiment the way Vampires are fearful of garlic.
cortezthekiller Wrote:How exactly does he sound like an 8th grader, though? I wish I knew all those words in the 8th grade. I've never heard an 8th grader call someone a "poet laureate" before.