Posts: 1,079
Threads: 101
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation:
0
Good call....I definitely hear the same chord structure. A whole new appreciation for that NOIS version...my all time favorite!
Posts: 892
Threads: 32
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation:
0
I've said it before and I'll say it again: M@W is an album of outstanding musicisanship. That's why fans of Progressive Rock tend to dig it. The only problem on that CD is the near-total absence of good songwriting. Oh, well.
Posts: 5,352
Threads: 277
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Killer Whale Tank Wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again: M@W is an album of outstanding musicisanship. That's why fans of Progressive Rock tend to dig it. The only problem on that CD is the near-total absence of good songwriting. Oh, well.
WTF?

cratch:

cratch:
near-total absence of good songwriting? Do you even like the Hip anymore?
Imagine a world before the "beginning was the word.”
Posts: 1,577
Threads: 35
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation:
0
isn't it the album where Gord apparently wrote the lyrics by writing song fragments on post-it notes and then pulling them together randomly to create songs. I remember reading something about that. might explain The Bastard.
purple italian,
ct
Posts: 892
Threads: 32
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation:
0
Uh...sure, I love the Hip. Just not that particular record.
Chris Tanz underscores my point. Too many of those songs come across as in-studio concoctions...the lack of compelling melodies, in particular, is a problem, but the lyrics can be pretty unfocused too. As you'd expect, given the method of composition (and it's revealing to me that Downie has since abandoned that approach).
Anyway, M@W has been beat up enough. I just think the musicianship versus songwriting angle is a good way of solving the puzzle of why some people love it, while a good number of others rate it as the worst Hip CD.
Posts: 6,675
Threads: 359
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
0
Wow, good call on the Bad Religion album cover comparison!