skippy the wonder dog Wrote:And that's what makes live music good: interaction.
Well, I'll agree that a certain
type of interaction can
help improve live music.
Let's be real here: Billy's Saskatoon anecdote is something completely different than your London anecdote. I'd be the first to admit that what Billy experienced
is something
magical. What
you experienced is something
miserable.
I'll always remember a Phish show I saw in the mid 90's, and being the casual fan I am, I fail to recollect the tune ("Bouncing Around the Room", perhaps?), but it featured the entire crowd literally bouncing up and down during a jam, and then the band started lightening up the groove, easing off the tempo, and lowering the actual volume of their instruments, until they arrived at complete silence.... and the once rambunctious crowd went perfectly still, serene and eerily hushed.....until the band started slowly playing again, turning the volume back up at a steady rate, until the crowd was in hysterical chaos. It was an incredible experience.
Again, it all goes back whether your right to enjoy a show enfringes on another's. Some aspects of the concert atmosphere are wonderful, some are distracting but tolerable, and others are completely disruptive.
The only thing "magical" that can come from a run-of-the-mill rendition of Pigeon Camera is
listening to Mr. Downie masterfully impart the vocal melody as Baker delivers a smooth, clean lead. The dude in the Red Wings jersey beside me booming out "OOOOOOhhhverrrr theyyyrrrre thaaat's myyy roooom!!!" does nothing but detract from the experience.
Perhaps I'm an idealist, but why can't we keep the "magical" and eliminate the "miserable"?