Posts: 1,502
Threads: 59
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation:
0
How's this? Copy, paste and repost it with your edits...
"Dear Tragically Hip,
You are receiving this email due to disappointment in your leagues of fans. It seems your current set-lists are becoming increasingly bland and tiresome. Your dearly devoted fans, witnessing your every song, have decided that it may be time for a vote of sorts. You post on your official site the opportunity for your fans to vote for their favourite five (5) songs and, after a designated amount of time, the voting ceases and the top five are picked. Those songs are then played in November in Toronto as part of the new, revamped set-list. This email has been the result of a thread on the Hipbase (<!-- w --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.hipbase.com">www.hipbase.com</a><!-- w -->) and the fans that frequent it."
Posts: 1,035
Threads: 44
Joined: Mar 2003
Reputation:
0
Yeah I think that's pretty good..but it should be all shows not just Toronto.
Posts: 1,515
Threads: 125
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation:
0
Damn, I'd go to a show if they played poets for a whole set...and that's all...it's The Hip people..
Posts: 892
Threads: 32
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation:
0
This is a brutal idea. Why would the band want to surrender creative control over what they play on a nightly basis? If I were a professional performer, up there playing material night after night, I would DELETE any such e-mail. Being a fan means enjoying an artist's creative process, and offering feedback, sure, but not dictating to the artist as though they are supplying a 'product' and the 'customer is always right.' LET THE HIP BE THE HIP. If you don't like it, then stay the f**k away from their shows.
Posts: 892
Threads: 32
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation:
0
Hey, I can't blame you for trying, and you (or we) have the right to communicate with whomever we want, sure. But on the fundamental issue, I still say the idea of fans dictating to artists blows. Yes, sure, they want to please the crowd and factor that into their choices; yes, sure, they want to promote their material, and that also plays into their decisions. But the point is that the choices come from WITHIN the band and are a product of its internal dynamics, whatever they are. And I think this becomes even more important when enduring a grinding touring schedule and your life is heavily regimented---the freedom to have the stage be a place of expression, not one of taking orders like a french-fry jockey at MacDonald's. So the appropriate reaction to the kinds of demands you (we) want to make would be to tell you (us) to take a flying leap. And if it were me, I wouldn't be that polite :x
Posts: 3,777
Threads: 62
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
0
I actually think Killer Whale Tank makes some very good points. I understand the thinking on the other side also. What I don't understand is the pure hatred some people seem to have for NOIS, Courage, and Blow. Sure they are played a lot but if 90 percent of people want to hear them live, shouldn't those people be entitled to that. Myself, I don't need to hear them but most Hip fans at concerts just want to hear the hits, and who am I to decide what they should play? I mean, I have no strong desire to hear the most obscure songs like some people. Personally, I think songs like 'Blonde Solid' and 'Get Back Again' are good songs but not revolutionary enough that they MUST be played live. I only get to one or two Hip shows every two years so I'm just glad to see them when I do. I don't have the luxury of seeing them 20 times a year and if I did, I wouldn't be bitching about them not playing 'Maria' or something.
Posts: 4,352
Threads: 136
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation:
0
btw, the hip don't always play blow at high dough.