[cferneyh]

..your leafs are quite old and boring....

If you actually knew what you were talking about, I might be able to take you seriously.

Average year of birth of the Leafs: 1976.4
Average year of birth of the Canucks: 1977.6

Wow. Are those Leafs ever old. And you claim to watch hockey?

Keep trying - maybe you'll make sense one of these days. Though I think Cloutier has a better chance of leading the Canucks to the Cup than you do of making a coherent argument.

yeah..i'm the only one who's called the leafs old...and did i ever claim that the nucks were young?? no..once again you stuff words into peoples mouths..i guess i don't have the time to sit in front of a computer all day and look up stats to prove the leafs are a whopping one year on average younger than the nucks...you can be a dickhead sometimes

Yeah, going to Yahoo sports, opening up the Leafs and Canucks rosters and adding up 23 years of birth and then dividing by 23 (two times) took hours. I'm fairly certain it took me about as much time to shoot down your lame argument as it did for you to type it up. But hey, I can't say I'm surprised that "waaaaaaaaaaa, you've got too much time on your hands" is your best defense.

Actually, I can be a dickhead most of the time - but that's generally to people who deserve it. I've told you before and I'll tell you again, if you can't take it, why do you bother? This discussion had nothing to do with you or tiger. It was a discussion between Mike and I about the Leafs' fortunes this season. But you and your boyfriend had to chime in, and when I came back with facts that you don't like, you start to whine about how mean I am.

Since you are so sensitive I think you should stick to discussions that (a) are directed at you specifically and (b) are only about topics you agree with. Otherwise your whining makes you seem like a little suckhole.