[sherpahigh]

From which peer-reviewed journal was the idea that people who favour Stephen Harper are "retarded?" Just curious since it's obvious you're all about consistency.

its pretty obvious it was opinion.

ooooh burn. ooooooh. ooooooh burn.

and such an eloquent opinion it was... :roll:

If you don't want to take an article that uses facts from the FBI, Juristat, UK Home Office and Statistics Canada to argue it's position seriously, then that's your choice.

I've got an idea, why don't you throw up some peer reviewed information that spins an increase violent crime rate and gun crime in the UK since they banned guns into a good thing.

I've got no interest in discussing politics with someone who believes that people with differing opinions than their own are "retarded". So until you decide to stop with the childish name calling and realize that your opinion is not the only one that matters, I'll have a pretty hard time taking anything you say too seriously.