cferneyh Wrote:Please. The girl is a trillion times more famous now than she ever would have been otherwise (quick - someone name the winner). And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the whole point of these pageants to get attention?
I'd agree that she's a trillion times more
infamous (a notable difference there) than she would have been otherwise -- that's my point.
Understand that I am by no means taking pity on her for pathetic response; I'm suggesting that the avalanche of attention it is receiving signifies how equally pathetic collective society is....and
that is a thousand times more disturbing to me than some blonde in a teen beauty pageant stumbling through her response to a question about geographic literacy in the US.
I understand the 'why', as explained by skippy; there's no argument that as a collective, humans like to see people in some perceived position of envy (whether it be celebrity or athletic prowess, or wealth, etc.) get knocked down, and a majority will even rush in to kick 'em themselves when they can. That phenomenon, in and of itself, doesn't speak highly of human "civilization"; but when the 'victim' is a contestant in a freaking
teen beauty pageant, it's that much more pathetic.
Seriously -- who feels that an 18 year old girl from South Carolina who has been prodded though the "Little Miss" circuit her entire life is in need of being "knocked down a few pegs"? Isn't it exactly the opposite? Isn't she one who will most likely be in dire need of being "propped up" someday soon, when in some crisis of identity, she suddenly realizes that good posture and a permasmile don't mean shit in terms of defining self worth and strong character?