Posts: 958
Threads: 6
Joined: Nov 2004
Reputation:
0
Well Esthete looks like you'll get your wish for no rematch after that savage beating USC laid on the Irish Saturday. Touchdown jesus must be spinning in his grave after that one. I'll have to suck it up and cheer for OSU in the title game cause my hatred for USC is too deep to ever consider supporting them.
Posts: 2,144
Threads: 97
Joined: Jun 2003
Reputation:
0
I agree, USC is waaaaay overrated and I think the suits who run the BCS and the networks will be disappointed with the outcome of a Ohio State and USC title matchup coz I think Ohio State's offense will murder the USC defense.
Posts: 3,777
Threads: 62
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
0
Unless USC loses their next game, be prepared for a one sided championship game against Ohio State (like VH said). Ohio State will murder USC.
Posts: 2,568
Threads: 80
Joined: Oct 2003
Reputation:
0
Yeah. The BCS is so ridiculous. The fact that USC gets more love than Michigan is bogus. I understand that USC had a slightly stronger schedule, and that is adequately reflected in the computer rankings (USC = .940, UM = .930) but it's the Harris Poll (USC = .9512, UM = .9172) and Coaches poll (USC = .9467, UM = .9175) that are pushing USC into the #2 slot in the overall BCS rankings. There is no freaking way that you can look at these two teams, both objectively and subjectively, and conclude that USC is a better team than Michigan. None.
USC beat ND by 20 at home, UM beat ND by 26 in South Bend. Advantage: Michigan.
USC's loss came to unranked Oregon State, who lost 4 games total, and including UCLA (6-5) and Washington State (6-6). Michigan's loss came to #1 and undefeated OSU. Advantage: Michigan.
Obviously, those casting votes are using that privilege to quash an OSU / UM rematch instead of pairing the best two teams, which is the intention of the system. That itself is a tremendous indictment of the BCS.
Though it does give my Buckeyes a more winable NC game (in my opinion), I do not think it will be a blowout. Carroll is too good, and he has too much talent. It will be slugfest, with OSU taking fewer slugs (I hope!).
Posts: 2,144
Threads: 97
Joined: Jun 2003
Reputation:
0
I think what irks me the most is the national media's unspoken assumption that because USC came so close to winning the national championship last year that they deserve a shot at the title when the strength of schedule between USC and Michigan is so close. Lest those national media chowderheads forget, USC was leading in the final minutes last year and assumed that the game was almost over, allowing Texas to kill them in the final minutes. I'm not a big fan of Michigan (Wisconsin and Penn State backer) but they played tooth and nail with Ohio State and very nearly came out the winner. I want to see that same tooth and nail battle, not a competition between a gutsy, blue collar team and a So Cal pretty boy media fantasy.
Posts: 958
Threads: 6
Joined: Nov 2004
Reputation:
0
Florida it is...I think OSU should handle them pretty easily, but then again I didn't think Texas would beat USC last year so who knows. The USC-Mighican Rose Bowl could be quite the match up depending on which USC team shows up. If it's the one that beat Notre Dame two weeks ago then it should be a good game, if it's the one that lost to UCLA this weekend then Michigan will destroy them. As an Irish fan though I'm most interested in the Sugar Bowl. Brady Quinn has one last chance to prove he can actually win a big game, and ND is also trying to avoid setting an NCAA record with 9 straight bowl loses. :roll: