Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Forsberg a Flyer!!
#1

Wow...

Philly is set. Talk about taking a run for the Cup. This means that Roenick is out, and all the sports websites have him heading to LA. Perfect place for a character like that...

Rory
Halifax
Reply
#2

It is a good day to be a Flyers fan as I am, although I am sad to see Roenick go. He is a charecter. But no doubt it Forsberg is a great improvement for the team.
Reply
#3

:jump and um :jump. I need something to look forward to after the painful football season of last year. Looks like the Flyers are it.

-Jenna
Reply
#4

Look at this lineup.. <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.philadelphiaflyers.com/team/roster/rosterlist.asp">http://www.philadelphiaflyers.com/team/ ... erlist.asp</a><!-- m --> Take Roenick away, and its still pretty awesome, the Flyers weakspot for years has been in goal, if Esche stands tall in the playoffs they should be in the finals. And thats fine by me, my motto is and always has been:

"anyone but Toronto" :wink:

ps: GO HABS!!!!!!!

Imagine a world before the "beginning was the word.”
Reply
#5

There is no one in the league more injury prone than Forsberg. Hatcher is big and slow when the game is moving more uptempo. And the Rag$ have proven time and time again that money doesn't buy Cups.

In other words, don't start planning your Stanley Cup parade route just yet Philly fans.

(((yes, I'm a Philly hating Leaf fan - is it obvious?)))
Reply
#6

cferneyh Wrote:There is no one in the league more injury prone than Forsberg. Hatcher is big and slow when the game is moving more uptempo. And the Rag$ have proven time and time again that money doesn't buy Cups.

In other words, don't start planning your Stanley Cup parade route just yet Philly fans.

(((yes, I'm a Philly hating Leaf fan - is it obvious?)))

Maybe so, but they are going to be a hell of a lot better than the Leafs. It is ging to be like the early 80's allover again for Leaf fans.
Reply
#7

LizardKing51 Wrote:Look at this lineup.. <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.philadelphiaflyers.com/team/roster/rosterlist.asp">http://www.philadelphiaflyers.com/team/ ... erlist.asp</a><!-- m --> Take Roenick away, and its still pretty awesome, the Flyers weakspot for years has been in goal, if Esche stands tall in the playoffs they should be in the finals. And thats fine by me, my motto is and always has been:

"anyone but Toronto" :wink:

ps: GO HABS!!!!!!!

Yes - that is one BEAUTIFUL roster!!!

PS - Hey Roenick - KISS MY ASS!!! (Sorry - couldn't resist)
Reply
#8

NMAS Wrote:
cferneyh Wrote:There is no one in the league more injury prone than Forsberg. Hatcher is big and slow when the game is moving more uptempo. And the Rag$ have proven time and time again that money doesn't buy Cups.

In other words, don't start planning your Stanley Cup parade route just yet Philly fans.

(((yes, I'm a Philly hating Leaf fan - is it obvious?)))

Maybe so, but they are going to be a hell of a lot better than the Leafs. It is ging to be like the early 80's allover again for Leaf fans.

Yeah yeah yeah. And for the past five years I kept reading about how good the Rag$ were gonna be because they signed Holik and a million other free agents. Then traded for Bure. Then traded for Kovalev. Then traded for Jagr.

As much as I hate to admit it, I see the Sens as the team to beat in the East, provided Hasek's groin holds up and he's 80% of the player he was.
Reply
#9

Jenna_Bird Wrote::jump and um :jump. I need something to look forward to after the painful football season of last year. Looks like the Flyers are it.

-Jenna

Wow Jenna - I thought you were an Eagles Fan...

"Painful football season"?? Are you kidding? They gave us one of the best seasons ever - NFC Champions - remember that? They made it to the Superbowl - something Eagles havent been able to do since 1980. Yeah - they lost, but all in all, it was one great season.

Now start showing some of that Eagles Pride :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Reply
#10

The Rangers have some sort of curse on them I think.
Reply
#11

when did the Rangers get nicknamed the "Rag$"?

ct
Reply
#12

When they started throwing stupid money at players in an effort to become respectable.

I'm fairly certain it was Isles fans who came up with it.
Reply
#13

the flyers are the new rangers

7/17/95-Craven
11/18/96-Saskatoon
7/21/97-Saskatoon
9/16/00-Winnipeg
11/24/00-Red Deer
07/14/02-Camrose
9/26/02-Edmonton
9/27/02-Edmonton
8/1/03-Kelowna
6/22/04-Edmonton
11/17/04-Edmonton
11/20/04-Saskatoon
10/28/06-Calgary
1/19/07-Regina
7/18/07-Saskatoon
6/22/08-Calgary
8/4/09-Saskatoon
9/14/09-Edmonton
9/19/09-Banff
7/14/11-Edmonton
1/23/13-Edmonton
7/6/13-Saskatoon
10/10/15-Houston
7/28/16-Edmonton
7/30/16-Edmonton
8/01/16-Calgary
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)