PunBB
NHL - Printable Version

+- PunBB (https://punbb.in)
+-- Forum: General Discussion - Hipbase.com (https://punbb.in/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Non Tragically Hip Discussion (https://punbb.in/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: NHL (/showthread.php?tid=7091)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490


Re: NHL - VioletlightHeron - 10-13-2008

ryan93 Wrote:I'm in shock, very sad news out of Russia today, 19 year old Alexei Cherepenov collapsed & died today during a KHL game. Terrible news. My thoughts & prayers definitely go out to his family, 19 is way too young to go. And as a Rangers fan, this news is devasting. I personally was really, really looking forward to Alexei joining the Rangers, likely next season.
Hopefully we get the MSG feed of the Rangers/Devils game tonight.

Do they know the cause of death yet? Arrythmia or an enlarged heart that wasnt found in a physical? What an age to go at.... Sad


Re: NHL - skippy the wonder dog - 10-13-2008

That's two hockey players in a one-year period. The other was that guy played for Windsor.

I'm just saying.


Re: NHL - Tthip - 10-14-2008

ryan93 Wrote:19 year old Alexei Cherepenov collapsed & died today during a KHL game.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/news/story?id=3642466">http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/news/story?id=3642466</a><!-- m -->

There are reports of negligence coming out.
Apparently Cherepanov suffered from chronic ischemia, a medical condition in which not enough blood gets to the heart or other organs. There was no ambulance on duty and when it finally did arrive it did not even have a defibrillator


Re: NHL - skippy the wonder dog - 10-14-2008

That's not negligence.

That's just another day in Russia.


Re: NHL - VioletlightHeron - 10-14-2008

skippy the wonder dog Wrote:That's not negligence.

That's just another day in Russia.

I wouldnt be surprised to hear if the paramedic was drunk on duty or left their post to get some goods on the black market.


Re: NHL - d_alex_d - 10-15-2008

skippy the wonder dog Wrote:That's two hockey players in a one-year period. The other was that guy played for Windsor.

I'm just saying.

Don't forget about Luc Bourdon, killed in a motorcycle crash in the summer.


Re: NHL - skippy the wonder dog - 10-15-2008

d_alex_d Wrote:
skippy the wonder dog Wrote:That's two hockey players in a one-year period. The other was that guy played for Windsor.

I'm just saying.

Don't forget about Luc Bourdon, killed in a motorcycle crash in the summer.

I was thinking specifically of falling dead of mysterious cardiac ailments.


Re: NHL - tigerthelion - 10-16-2008

direwolf74 Wrote:Overall a much better effort from the Flames tonight, but they still don't have an answer for the Sedin sisters. They kill us every single time, and the Flames' inability to defend against those weenies is the sole reason they lost tonight. And man oh man, did we ever get hosed by the refs in OT. Brutal.

:nooooo

F**k I hate the 'Nucks.

Canucks with two consecutive wins against the Flames this year. Great stuff. Deal with it and stop blaming the refs. Why don't you blame Phaneuf for being a shitty defensive defenseman or blame Kipper for letting in goal after goal? :rambo:


Re: NHL - direwolf74 - 10-20-2008

tigerthelion Wrote:
direwolf74 Wrote:Overall a much better effort from the Flames tonight, but they still don't have an answer for the Sedin sisters. They kill us every single time, and the Flames' inability to defend against those weenies is the sole reason they lost tonight. And man oh man, did we ever get hosed by the refs in OT. Brutal.

:nooooo

F**k I hate the 'Nucks.

Canucks with two consecutive wins against the Flames this year. Great stuff. Deal with it and stop blaming the refs. Why don't you blame Phaneuf for being a shitty defensive defenseman or blame Kipper for letting in goal after goal? :rambo:

I wasn't blaming the refs for the loss. I just mentioned that we got screwed in OT...which we did. The Flames lost those first two games because of their crappy defensive coverage, particularly against the Sedins. And yea, Kipper has been brutal so far this year, but his defencemen aren't helping him at all and the forwards aren't back-checking. Same goes for those back-to-back losses against the Oil on the weekend. The Flames get a lead and then they sit back, stop skating, and allow the opposition to get right back into it. They have no killer instinct right now and it's painful to watch. I admit I'm embarrassed to be a Flames fan right now. I have faith that they'll eventually get their shit together and find their game, but they've started out every season since the lockout in the same fashion and the fans and media in this city are running out of patience.


Re: NHL - tigerthelion - 10-20-2008

direwolf74 Wrote:
tigerthelion Wrote:
direwolf74 Wrote:Overall a much better effort from the Flames tonight, but they still don't have an answer for the Sedin sisters. They kill us every single time, and the Flames' inability to defend against those weenies is the sole reason they lost tonight. And man oh man, did we ever get hosed by the refs in OT. Brutal.

:nooooo

F**k I hate the 'Nucks.

Canucks with two consecutive wins against the Flames this year. Great stuff. Deal with it and stop blaming the refs. Why don't you blame Phaneuf for being a shitty defensive defenseman or blame Kipper for letting in goal after goal? :rambo:

I wasn't blaming the refs for the loss. I just mentioned that we got screwed in OT...which we did. The Flames lost those first two games because of their crappy defensive coverage, particularly against the Sedins. And yea, Kipper has been brutal so far this year, but his defencemen aren't helping him at all and the forwards aren't back-checking. Same goes for those back-to-back losses against the Oil on the weekend. The Flames get a lead and then they sit back, stop skating, and allow the opposition to get right back into it. They have no killer instinct right now and it's painful to watch. I admit I'm embarrassed to be a Flames fan right now. I have faith that they'll eventually get their shit together and find their game, but they've started out every season since the lockout in the same fashion and the fans and media in this city are running out of patience.

They're probably dogging it because they hate Keenan. Of course, the other part of it is that they just don't have very many great players.


Re: NHL - tth_fan - 10-21-2008

Well this is a little ridiculous... a 2nd NHL team in Toronto before Winnipeg or Quebec get a franchise back!? Or before even giving Hamilton a shot? Just plain dumb.
Funny thing is, if there is an expansion team in Toronto, they would probably win a Stanley Cup before the Leafs win another!!

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=253294&lid=sublink01&lpos=headlines_main

It appears some National Hockey League officials think Toronto is big enough to have two teams.

According to The Globe and Mail, NHL governors have had informal talks about putting a second team in Toronto.

''Why shouldn't we put another team in the best and biggest market in the world?'' one governor told the newspaper anonymously, adding one scenario involves Research in Motion CEO Jim Balsillie being awarded an expansion franchise after coming to the aid of the financially-strapped Nashville Predators.

''I've heard bits and pieces of this scenario, although not in that kind of detail,'' Calgary Flames co-owner Harley Hotchkiss told The Globe and Mail. ''Our priority is to have the existing franchises solid.''

President of Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment, Richard Peddie told the newspaper his organization would listen to any expansion suggestion and downplayed any negative effect it could have on the Maple Leafs.

''When and if the league brings expansion to the table, we'll listen and decide what is best for hockey,'' Peddie told The Globe and Mail. ''The Maple Leafs would not be hurt one bit. In fact, it would help them. They could make all kinds of money renting the Air Canada Centre to the other team.''


Re: NHL - grimes - 10-21-2008

Actually that's the best idea I've heard in a long time. As much as I'd love Winnipeg, Quebec, or the Hammer to have NHL teams, there's no denying that from a business perspective a 2nd Toronto team would easily be the best option. Hell to appease the Leafs, have the new team pay rent to the Leafs and play out of the ACC rather than spend several hundred million on a new building.


Re: NHL - VioletlightHeron - 10-21-2008

I don't think the city of Toronto needs another hockey team and it would be better to relocate the Preds to Winnipeg or Hamilton. I don't think another team in the GTA would survive very long because I imagine Bettman would make any new owner pay a hell of a financial price to move out of the US (him and his "hockey first in US" mentality :roll: ) and the Leafs would charge way too much to rent out the ACC. IMO Nashville, Phoenix or Columbus needs to be relocated back in Canada where they can thrive financially.


Re: NHL - direwolf74 - 10-21-2008

tth_fan Wrote:Well this is a little ridiculous... a 2nd NHL team in Toronto before Winnipeg or Quebec get a franchise back!? Or before even giving Hamilton a shot? Just plain dumb.

Agreed. This is certainly the most idiotic idea the league has had in a long time.


Re: NHL - grimes - 10-21-2008

Well can any of you provide justification for why this idea is so 'idiotic' or do you just have a hate on for Toronto?

From a business perspective it is a no-brainer. Southern Ontario is easily the largest hockey market on earth and with only one team it is grossly underserved. Winnipeg's building is quite small by NHL standards, and it's highly questionable as to whether the corporate base there is large enough to buy up all the high priced boxes and club seating. Hamilton would certainly address the need for another southern Ontario team, but in additonal to having to appease MLSE, a perspective Hamilton owner would also have to appease the Sabres, as they get a decent percentage of their fans from this side of the border. Corporate support could be an issue there as well, plus there's the expense of renovating Copps or building a few facility.