PunBB
NHL - Printable Version

+- PunBB (https://punbb.in)
+-- Forum: General Discussion - Hipbase.com (https://punbb.in/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Non Tragically Hip Discussion (https://punbb.in/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: NHL (/showthread.php?tid=7091)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490


- Hard Canadian - 01-29-2007

Report: Calgary, Edmonton, eyeing Tucker

i never liked darcy, i say get what you can for him and lose him. i wonder if philly would dump forsberg for him if tucker would agree to sign after the season.


- tigerthelion - 01-29-2007

thehip420 Wrote:Report: Calgary, Edmonton, eyeing Tucker

i never liked darcy, i say get what you can for him and lose him. i wonder if philly would dump forsberg for him if tucker would agree to sign after the season.

I'd take Tucker in a heartbeat. The only downfall is that he gets injured because he plays so hard and he's about 180 pounds soaking wet.

I doubt the Leafs have cap room to get Forsberg. Plus, the Leafs should be sellers, not buyers. Forsberg is an old man who is just about ready for retirement with his body breaking down on him so much now.

BTW, the Leafs could get a lot for Tucker.

I'd love Tucker on the Canucks. Tucker is like Matt Cooke except that Tucker can score and actually has the balls to fight.


- day_for_night - 01-29-2007

all i know is edmonton needs to make a few moves, BADLY. tucker would be a great addition to the team. still, i'm holding out hope that kevin lowe can pull off the kind of miracle trades ala last season that got us to the finals...


- ryan93 - 01-29-2007

When i first read of the Conroy trade i thought it was a 2nd pick in both 2007 & 2008, but i guess the 2007 pick is only a 4th rounder. Jamie Lundmark has been a complete bust so far yeah, us Ranger fans had very high hopes for him a few years back. I actually thought he might be coming around last season when he played very well & was actually productive following his trade to Calgary...but he's been a bust again this year.


- tth_fan - 01-30-2007

Conroy should really try to get his #22 back...he doesn't look the same without it


- direwolf74 - 01-30-2007

Douglas Wrote:What happened to McCarty? Is he injured?

Yup. Something about his hip. On the Fan 960 today Rob Kerr mentioned that it's a recurring injury and that he'll be out for a while longer. I totally agree regarding Goddard. I think he's definitely earned his right to stay with the big club for a while. Our rookies have been awesome this year, especially after Iginla went down. I can't say enough good things about Dustin Boyd, Brian Moss and Mark Giordano. And ya gotta love Conroy being back in town. Combine that with Iggy's expected return this weekend, and this should give the boys a much needed lift. They've gone an impressive 7-2-2 with Iginla out of the lineup, which is way better than I expected, but it looks like his absence is starting to catch up with them. They looked awful against Minny and Chicago this week. The only reason we earned points in those games is because Kipper stood on his head. Here's hoping for a much better effort against the Kings tomorrow night.


- laliber - 01-30-2007

This might have been posted already…if so then this is a bump…in honor of those who tend the LEOTR
Knob Hockey - Ilya Bryzgalov
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Deyi408m3a8">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Deyi408m3a8</a><!-- m -->


- cferneyh - 01-30-2007

direwolf74 Wrote:And ya gotta love Conroy being back in town. Combine that with Iggy's expected return this weekend, and this should give the boys a much needed lift.

I dunno - I just don't see Conroy having much of an impact. He's certainly not going to be the #1 centre, which means the only real time he'll see with Iginla may be some time on the PP. Other than that he's likely going to be the 3rd line centre. Conroy simply isn't the same player that he used to be.....and let's face it....other than the 2001-02 season he's never even really come close to being a point-a-game player anyway.


- laliber - 01-30-2007

missed this over the weekend - never saw him play but my dad swore by the Gumper...and his quotes....

Goalie great Gump Worsley dies
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=9c469460-83c6-42b3-b667-253c40bea8fd&k=57562">http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/s ... fd&k=57562</a><!-- m -->

Gump on drinking champagne from the Stanley Cup
"Tasted like horse pee from a tin cup."


- direwolf74 - 01-30-2007

cferneyh Wrote:
direwolf74 Wrote:And ya gotta love Conroy being back in town. Combine that with Iggy's expected return this weekend, and this should give the boys a much needed lift.

I dunno - I just don't see Conroy having much of an impact. He's certainly not going to be the #1 centre, which means the only real time he'll see with Iginla may be some time on the PP. Other than that he's likely going to be the 3rd line centre. Conroy simply isn't the same player that he used to be.....and let's face it....other than the 2001-02 season he's never even really come close to being a point-a-game player anyway.

I agree, this trade could totally backfire, and he's had a pretty disappointing year so far in terms of points, but a fresh start might be just what he needs. He's said all along that he never wanted to leave Calgary, and yesterday he mentioned how excited he is to be back here. He's not gonna be a first line guy. I think Sutter brought him back to basically challenge some of our 3rd and 4th liners, who quite frankly have been pretty sub-par over the last few weeks. He's still a pretty solid two-way player who can kill penalties and help with the power play, and he's a just a great guy to have in the dressing room. It certainly doesn't hurt having him back, and I think he's an improvement over the completely useless Jamie Lundmark.


- direwolf74 - 01-30-2007

And Conroy scores first for the Flames. Welcome back, Connie!

GO FLAMES GO!!!

Big Grin


- tigerthelion - 01-30-2007

direwolf74 Wrote:
cferneyh Wrote:
direwolf74 Wrote:And ya gotta love Conroy being back in town. Combine that with Iggy's expected return this weekend, and this should give the boys a much needed lift.

I dunno - I just don't see Conroy having much of an impact. He's certainly not going to be the #1 centre, which means the only real time he'll see with Iginla may be some time on the PP. Other than that he's likely going to be the 3rd line centre. Conroy simply isn't the same player that he used to be.....and let's face it....other than the 2001-02 season he's never even really come close to being a point-a-game player anyway.

I agree, this trade could totally backfire, and he's had a pretty disappointing year so far in terms of points, but a fresh start might be just what he needs. He's said all along that he never wanted to leave Calgary, and yesterday he mentioned how excited he is to be back here. He's not gonna be a first line guy. I think Sutter brought him back to basically challenge some of our 3rd and 4th liners, who quite frankly have been pretty sub-par over the last few weeks. He's still a pretty solid two-way player who can kill penalties and help with the power play, and he's a just a great guy to have in the dressing room. It certainly doesn't hurt having him back, and I think he's an improvement over the completely useless Jamie Lundmark.

Balderdash! Man, you gotta stop believing anything that comes out of the mouths of pro athletes. Craig Conroy signed with LA as a FREE AGENT. It was his choice. He CHOSE TO SIGN WITH ANOTHER TEAM. Actions speak louder than words. He goes where the money is, like every other athlete. This sappy, "I love Calgary" schtick is a complete mockery. If he never wanted to leave Calgary, all he had to do was sign with them instead of LA. :rambo:


- direwolf74 - 01-31-2007

tigerthelion Wrote:This sappy, "I love Calgary" schtick is a complete mockery.

I disagree. Conroy is a rarity in pro sports in that he's actually a genuine guy. He used to come into my store quite often and I had the pleasure of chatting with him on more than a few occassions. When he says he enjoys playing here, I believe him. Bottom line is the team loves him, the fans love him, and under the new system we can actually afford him. I for one am happy to have him back. The standing ovation he received when he stepped on the ice tonight was great. Oh, and did I mention he scored 2 goals?

:mrgreen:


- cferneyh - 01-31-2007

direwolf74 Wrote:
tigerthelion Wrote:This sappy, "I love Calgary" schtick is a complete mockery.

I disagree. Conroy is a rarity in pro sports in that he's actually a genuine guy. He used to come into my store quite often and I had the pleasure of chatting with him on more than a few occassions. When he says he enjoys playing here, I believe him. Bottom line is the team loves him, the fans love him, and under the new system we can actually afford him. I for one am happy to have him back. The standing ovation he received when he stepped on the ice tonight was great. Oh, and did I mention he scored 2 goals?

:mrgreen:

Gotta agree with direwolf74 here. When he "left" it was because the Flames (or should I say Sutter) didn't offer him a contract. I think that if Sutter had come within 80% of what the Kings offered, he would have stayed. By trading for him Sutter has more or less admitted that he underestimated the guy's impact - at least in the dressing room. And with two goals tonight, I'll shut up about him being a shadow of his former self. :oops:


- Chris Tanz - 01-31-2007

How about Nik Antropov's second goal last night? Who does that kid think he is?

At various times this season I've written off both Antropov and Raycroft, but they're both looking pretty ok these days.

And maybe it just seems this way to me, but does anybody rip more pucks off the post than Alex Steen??

ct